#ITAT Judgments
Log in to FollowLatest ITAT Judgments updates, provisions, case laws, compliance requirements, tax implications and expert analysis under Income-tax law on TaxGuru.

Sec 68 Addition Deleted – Third-Party Statement on Alleged Entry Provider Insufficient Without Independent Evidence – ITAT Mumbai

Reopening Invalid – No Addition on Recorded Reasons; MAT U/s 115JB Quashed per Jet Airways – ITAT Mumbai

Referral Fee Reimbursement Not FTS – Following Earlier Years Orders, Additions Deleted – Revenue Appeal Dismissed – ITAT Mumbai

Penalty U/s 271(1)(c) Deleted – MAT Liability U/s 115JB Higher Than Normal Tax – No Tax Sought to be Evaded – ITAT Mumbai

Sec 153C Cash Addition Deleted – Pen Drive & Third-Party Statements Without Cross-Examination Insufficient – ITAT Mumbai

Reopening Quashed for Invalid Section U/s 151 – Approval by Wrong Authority Beyond 3 Years Held Void – ITAT Mumbai

Reopening Quashed: Mechanical Sec 151 Approval Invalid; “Yes, I am Satisfied” Insufficient: ITAT Kolkata

Bona Fide Claim by Charitable Trust Not Misreporting, 200% Penalty Unsustainable: ITAT Mumbai

Addition U/s 69 Deleted; AO/CIT(A) Inconsistency & No On-Money Evidence – ITAT Mumbai

Registration Not Determinative; Stock-in-Trade Taxable on Possession & Consideration – Rs 10.81 Cr Deleted – ITAT Mumbai

Allotment Letter Treated as Agreement to Sell – Stamp Value on Booking Date to Apply U/s 56(2)(x)

Section 271(1)(c) Penalty Deleted Because Addition Was Based on Estimated Bogus Purchases

Reopening Quashed – Sec 151 Approval by PCIT Invalid Beyond 3 Years; Reassessment Void – ITAT Mumbai

Reassessment Quashed: Sec 143(2) Notice Mandatory in 147 Cases; Return Filed Within TOLA Time Valid – ITAT Kolkata
Explore the latest ITAT Judgments updates on TaxGuru, including relevant Income-tax Act provisions, rules, notifications, circulars, judicial decisions and compliance guidance. The coverage highlights important tax positions, procedural requirements, assessments, deductions, penalties and litigation developments to help taxpayers and professionals understand the practical implications of changes in income-tax law.
