ITAT Judgment contain Income Tax related Judgments from Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Across India which includes ITAT Mumbai, Chennai, Delhi, Kolkutta, Hyderabad etc.
Income Tax : Article examines whether the MLI Principal Purpose Test has domestic effect under Section 90(1) following Nestlé SA and Sky High ...
Corporate Law : The article argues that failure to comply before the AO or CIT(A) can lead to adverse assessments, as higher forums generally cann...
Income Tax : ITAT held that Section 54 exemption must be examined separately for each residential house sold. Aggregating gains from multiple t...
Income Tax : ITAT held that delayed filing of Form 10B cannot defeat Section 11 exemption if the audit report is available before processing un...
Income Tax : Smt. Ranjana Kumari/Kalta Vs DCIT/ACIT (Central) (ITAT Chandigarh) The appeals involved three assessees belonging to the Kalta Gro...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore held Section 2(47)(v) inapplicable as the JDA did not satisfy Section 53A conditions, deleting capital gains for AY...
Income Tax : The issue concerns massive backlog in ITAT caused by unfilled positions and delayed appointments. The intervention highlights that...
Income Tax : A representation seeks doubling the SMC threshold due to inflation and higher dispute values. The key takeaway is that increasing ...
Income Tax : The tribunal held that a gift deed alone cannot establish legitimacy under Section 68. It directed fresh scrutiny of the donor’s...
Income Tax : Delhi ITAT allows Sanco Holding, a Norwegian company, to compute income from bareboat charter of seismic vessels under Article 21(...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi quashed Section 147 reassessment as the Section 148 notice was issued by an ITO lacking pecuniary jurisdiction under CB...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi quashed assessments as Section 143(2) notices were issued by an ITO lacking pecuniary jurisdiction under CBDT Instructi...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi quashed the assessment after holding that the Section 143(2) notice was issued by an ACIT lacking jurisdiction under CB...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore held JDA capital gains taxable in the completion certificate year, allowed Section 54/54F relief, and deleted deeme...
Income Tax : ITAT Pune allowed rectification under Section 254(2), correcting factual errors and granting Section 54EC deduction of ₹1 crore ...
Income Tax : ITAT Pune allowed rectification under Section 254(2), correcting factual errors and granting Section 54EC deduction of ₹1 crore ...
Income Tax : The ITAT Delhi has revised its hearing notice protocols. Physical notices will now be sent only once, with subsequent dates availa...
Income Tax : ITAT Chandigarh held that ITO Ward-3(1), Chandigarh had no jurisdiction to issue notice to an NRI and hence consequently the asses...
Income Tax : Central Government is pleased to appoint Shri G. S. Pannu, Vice-President of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, as President of th...
Income Tax : Ministry of Finance notified rules for appointment of members in various tribunals on 12.02.2020 in which practice of judicial and...
Chennai ITAT’s ruling in Bharat Engineering Construction Co. Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT clarifies eligibility for Sec 80IA deduction based on the nature of work executed. Detailed analysis provided.
Dive into the case of Pravinbhai Mumabhai Bharwad vs ITO as ITAT Ahmedabad annuls addition under section 69A, highlighting oversight of cash deposit proofs by AO and CIT(A).
ITAT Kolkata nullifies an assessment order under the Income Tax Act, ruling that framing an assessment in the name of a non-existing entity is void ab-initio.
Dive into Prakash Industries Ltd vs ACIT case dissected by ITAT Delhi, detailing FBT exemptions for transport services and medical expenses reimbursement, with expert insights.
Read about Durgapur Steel Peoples’ Cooperative Bank Ltd vs Director of Income Tax case. ITAT Kolkata rules that non-filing of SFT return isn’t grounds for penalty under Section 271FA.
ITAT Kolkata held that foreign Associated Enterprises are least complex entities and accordingly can be treated as tested parties for comparability analysis of international transaction.
ITAT Visakhapatnam has held that if working capital adjustment on ALP has been already factored in pricing/ profitability vis-à-vis that of its comparables, then, no separate upward adjustment on outstanding receivables is required.
ITAT Mumbai held that business restructuring entered into by an enterprise with its associated enterprise for eliminating duplicate corporate procedures falls within the ambit of “international transaction” as defined in section 92B of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Delhi held that as non-renewal doesn’t amount to termination, accordingly, receipt of compensation on account of non-renewal of contract cannot be taxed under section 28(ii)(e) of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Bangalore held that if the duration of software license is less than two years, then it should be treated as revenue expenditure and if the duration is more than two years, then it should be treated as capital expenditure.
