CA, CS, CMA : A comprehensive guide covering 175 legal compliances for July 2026 under FEMA, Income Tax, GST, SEBI, Companies Act, Labour Laws, ...
Income Tax : The Income-tax Act does not prescribe a single definition of "relative" for all purposes. Different provisions such as Sections 13...
Income Tax : Understand when 1% TDS applies on purchase of immovable property under Section 194-IA. Learn the Rs. 50 lakh threshold, compliance...
Income Tax : This guide explains when NRIs should use Form 128 and when payers should use Form 129 to reduce or eliminate excess TDS. It also c...
Income Tax : The article argues that Section 58(3) of the Income-tax Act, 2025 does not independently mandate books of account or tax audit for...
Income Tax : The issue was complexity in the existing tax law. It was clarified that the new Act simplifies structure by reducing sections and ...
Income Tax : This webinar breaks down the major structural and conceptual changes introduced in the new Income Tax Act, 2025. It helps professi...
Income Tax : The government informed Parliament that taxpayer-specific details of income tax searches cannot be disclosed due to confidentialit...
Income Tax : The Government clarified that the new income tax search provision does not expand powers or permit AI-based digital surveillance, ...
Income Tax : The representation highlights large-scale pendency and administrative bottlenecks under Sections 12AB and 80G, urging immediate re...
Income Tax : Madras HC set aside cognizance under the Income-tax Act, holding Section 223(1) BNSS mandates hearing the accused before cognizanc...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai quashed reassessment after finding no Section 143(2) notice and that the AO issued a final order disguised as a draft ...
Income Tax : Gujarat HC quashed a Section 148 notice, holding that a seized inquiry register without a live nexus to the assessee cannot justif...
Income Tax : Gujarat HC quashed Section 148 reassessment as it was issued beyond Section 149 limitation, holding Section 152(3) applies to sear...
Income Tax : Madras HC held that merely issuing a corrigendum acknowledging the return did not rectify the defective assessment process and ord...
Income Tax : CBDT has approved a scientific research institution under the Income-tax Act, 2025 for tax years 2026-27 to 2030-31. The notificat...
Income Tax : CBDT has approved the University of Hyderabad for scientific research under Section 45 of the Income-tax Act, 2025. The approval i...
Income Tax : The Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) approved the company under Section 35(1)(iia) for scientific research ...
Income Tax : The government enforced a tax collection assistance agreement with Japan effective from 8 July 2025. The notification enables cros...
Income Tax : CBDT updated DIN rules to align with new provisions introduced under the Finance Act, 2026. The circular mandates DIN for most tax...
ITAT Pune cancels Section 271(1)(c) penalty against Vikas Jayram Bhukan, citing a defective notice that failed to specify the charge, referencing Bombay High Court precedents.
Assessee is a co-operative society engaged in the business of providing credit facilities to its members. Assessee is claiming deduction u/s. 80P(2) of the Income Tax Act. Notably, vide intimation u/s. 143(1), the deduction u/s. 80P(2)(d) was disallowed.
Understand Section 79 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, concerning loss set-off in closely held companies. Explore judicial interpretations of “beneficial ownership” and its implications for corporate restructurings.
The assessee is a cooperative housing society located in Vile Parle, Mumbai and has been deriving rental income from commercial premises on the ground floor and partly in the basement. Notably, total amount of Rs. 2.40 Crores was granted by the Small Causes court as Mesne Profits to the assessee’s society.
ITAT Nagpur held that addition under section 68 towards bogus LTCG set aside as sale transaction of shares cannot be doubted. Thus, sale consideration received on sale of shares cannot be assessed as unexplained cash credit under section 68 of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Delhi grants Tata Teleservices significant tax relief, ruling pre-operative expenses for telecom expansion and customer acquisition costs as revenue expenditure.
ITAT Lucknow quashes Rs. 3.34 Lakh penalty on Mohd Husain, citing lack of fair opportunity by tax authorities and improper notice delivery. Case sent for re-adjudication.
Calcutta High Court sets aside an Income Tax Act Section 154 order for AY 2013-14, as it was issued against a deceased individual, allowing the daughter-in-law’s appeal.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal sets aside PCIT’s revisionary order against Synwave Industries, ruling original assessment not erroneous.
The Gauhati High Court has ruled that a retired High Court Judge and Upa-Lokayukta cannot be penalised by the Income Tax Department for TDS not reflecting in Form 26AS if employers confirm deposit. Demand notices totalling ₹8.4 lakhs set aside.
