CA, CS, CMA : Discover IBBI Circular No. IBBI/LIQ/74/2024 dated 28-06-2024 on voluntary liquidation processes under the Insolvency and Bankruptc...
Corporate Law : Discover how Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) protects homebuyers and other consumers, with a detailed analysis of financial a...
Corporate Law : Explore the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 alongside international bankruptcy laws, focusing on key differences, similaritie...
Corporate Law : Delhi HC's ruling on Tata Steel BSL Ltd. v. Venus Recruiters allows avoidance proceedings beyond CIRP, diverging from established ...
Corporate Law : Article explains various methods for voluntary company closure in India, including striking off, NCLT winding up, and voluntary li...
Corporate Law : Learn about the new guidelines by IBBI for Insolvency Professionals acting as IRPs, Liquidators, RPs, and BTs. Details on eligibil...
Corporate Law : IBBI updates the progress report format for liquidation processes, seeking comments by July 12, 2024. Learn about the new requirem...
Corporate Law : IBBI invites comments on proposed amendments to CIRP regulations, focusing on valuation processes, MSME treatment, voting protocol...
Corporate Law : Discover how the latest revisions in CIRP forms by IBBI aim to reduce the compliance burden on insolvency professionals and stream...
Corporate Law : The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India issues guidelines for Insolvency Professionals to act as Interim Resolution Professio...
Corporate Law : Detailed analysis of the NCLT Mumbai judgment in SBI vs Navjeevan Tyres, addressing issues of loan recall notice and corporate gua...
Corporate Law : NCLAT Delhi upholds NCLT decision against Rolta Private Limited's assignment agreement as malafide, prolonging CIRP process. Full ...
Company Law : Explore the Calcutta High Court's decision in Uphealth Holdings, INC. Vs Dr. Syed Sabahat Azim & Ors. regarding the applicability ...
Goods and Services Tax : Detailed analysis of Competition Commission of India's order regarding Cinema Ventures Pvt Ltd not passing GST rate reduction bene...
Custom Duty : Gujarat High Court abates customs tax appeals in Commissioner Of Customs (Preventive) Vs General Foods Ltd., citing IBC Sections 3...
Corporate Law : Detailed analysis of IBBI Order 229/2024 on Mr. Narender Kumar Sharma, resolving a show-cause notice with significant findings and...
Corporate Law : Explore the IBBI's decision on Mr. Gopal Krishna Raju regarding violations under the Companies Act, 2013 and Valuation Rules, incl...
Corporate Law : Explore IBBI's Disciplinary Order No. IBBI/DC/228/2024 dated 11 July 2024 against Reshma Mittal, detailing the CIRP process, alleg...
Corporate Law : Read the detailed analysis of IBBI's Disciplinary Committee order against Narender Kumar Sharma, an Insolvency Professional, regar...
Corporate Law : IBBI suspends & Penalises RP For submitting a revised resolution plan to the Adjudicating Authority (AA) without obtaining the fin...
The concept of reverse CIRP is not within the ambit of IBC and it is more of a judicial innovation propounded by the Hon’ble NCLAT. The sole purpose of IBC to rehabilitate the corporate debtor by replacing its management through a resolution plan is not fulfilled with the concept of Reverse CIRP.
NCLAT Chennai held that National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) is not proper Fora to determine the controversies revolving around the attachment of property under the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988.
NCLAT Chennai held that as assets proved to be fictitious/ fraudulent and seems to have been created in books of accounts with an intent to defraud the creditors. Accordingly, amount duly payable to liquidator for distribution under section 53 of I&B Code, 2016.
NCLT Delhi ordered initiation of CIRP as petition filed u/s. 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 by Financial Creditor is complete in all respect and it is clearly established that the Corporate Debtor is in default of a debt more than the minimum amount stipulated u/s. 4 (1) of the Code
SPS Steels Rolling Mills Limited and Ors. Vs Asansol Durgapur Development Authority and Anr. (Calcutta High Court) Learned Single Judge by the impugned order has reached to the conclusion that the transfer fee was exempted under the resolution plan sanctioned by the National Company Law Tribunal and has found that the demand of the respondent […]
NCLT Ahmedabad held that conjoint reading of Section 30 & Section 53 of IBC shows that the Financial Creditors are placed at a higher priority than Operational Creditors. Hence, as the Financial Creditors have not been paid in full, the Operational Creditors cannot claim a higher amount.
Once Resolution Plan stands approved, no alterations/modifications are permissible. It is either to be approved or disapproved, but any modification after approval of Resolution Plan by CoC, based on its commercial wisdom, is not open for judicial review unless it is found to be not in conformity with mandate of IBC Code.
NCLT Mumbai held that petition under section 7 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) duly admissible, as two essential qualification i.e. ‘debt’ and ‘default’ existed.
NCLAT Delhi held that explanation under section 14(1)(d) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) doesn’t apply to lease premium amount and lease rent.
NCLT Ahmedabad held that residuary jurisdiction of National Company Law Tribunal under section 60(5)(c) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 is limited. Accordingly, application rejected.
