Access significant and up-to-date high court judgments for legal insights and precedent. Stay informed about the latest legal decisions and their impact on various areas of law.
Corporate Law : Madras HC held morphed obscene images are a serious attack on a woman's privacy and dignity. It directed prompt police action and ...
Corporate Law : The Chhattisgarh High Court upheld the acquittal after finding the relationship was consensual. A later refusal to marry did not e...
Corporate Law : The Patna High Court held that media must avoid labels implying guilt before a trial concludes. It directed news platforms to rest...
Goods and Services Tax : The Madras High Court emphasized that Section 74 requires clear evidence of fraud, wilful misstatement, or suppression and cannot ...
Corporate Law : The Jharkhand High Court held that a marriage marked by 36 years of separation had become a "dead wood marriage," justifying disso...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court upheld joint insolvency proceedings against two interconnected real estate companies due to common management an...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court ruled that CoC and RP can surrender financially burdensome assets voluntarily, clarifying moratorium under section 1...
Income Tax : Gujarat HC has directed CBDT to ensure that there is a mandatory one-month gap between date for furnishing tax audit reports (unde...
Income Tax : Rajasthan High Court granted a one-month extension for filing TARs under Section 44AB for AY 2025-26, citing delayed audit utility...
Income Tax : The Gujarat High Court is hearing a petition from the Chartered Accountants Association regarding persistent glitches on the new I...
Income Tax : Calcutta High Court quashed the assessment, demand and penalty proceedings after holding that the assessee was denied a meaningful...
Goods and Services Tax : Chhattisgarh HC granted bail after finding no unimpeachable document proving the applicant owned the firm. Issues of involvement w...
Custom Duty : Bombay HC held that pendency of a writ petition does not prevent authorities from undertaking provisional assessment of imports af...
Corporate Law : Tripura High Court acquitted the accused after finding the complainant failed to prove financial capacity and valid statutory noti...
Income Tax : The Chhattisgarh High Court declined to direct the Income Tax Department to investigate alleged tax evasion after noting that the ...
Income Tax : The Court held that membership cannot be granted where the underlying flats do not exist and are merely refuge areas. It ruled tha...
Corporate Law : Bombay High Court implements "Rules for Video Conferencing 2022" for all courts in Maharashtra, Goa, and union territories, effect...
Income Tax : CBDT raises monetary limits for tax appeals: Rs. 60 lakh for ITAT, Rs. 2 crore for High Court, and Rs. 5 crore for Supreme Court, ...
Corporate Law : The Delhi High Court mandates new video conferencing protocols to enhance transparency and accessibility in court proceedings. Rea...
Income Tax : Income Tax Department Issues Instructions for Assessing Officers after Adverse Observations of Hon. Allahabad High Court in in Civ...
Difficulty in obtaining ‘C’ forms under the provisions of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 in order to avail concessional benefit of tax for purchase of High Speed Diesel from suppliers in other states.
The issue under consideration is whether the issue of notice u/s 147 for re-opening of assessment on the basis of difference in valuation report is justified in law?
Assessee couldn’t demonstrate with cogent evidences that there was business expediency or sufficient cause for such cash payment. Assessee failed to prove that the case was covered in the exception clause as provided under section 40A(3) read with Rule 6DD.
Tribunal in a detailed discussion contained in judgment, had rejected the contention of Revenue. Tribunal had taken into account the valuation of the existing machinery used at Daman and the valuation of the written down value of machinery transferred from Aurangabad to come to the conclusion that same did not exceed 20% of the total value of machinery. The entire issue was thus based on factual consideration and on appreciation of evidence on record. Thus, no question of law arose.
Kalpsutra Gujarat Vs Union of India (Gujarat High Court) HC issued notice to the department to understand from the respondents whether the omission on the part of the third party (Seller) in filing the GSTR-3B for the relevant period would be sufficient to block the Input Tax Credit of the writ applicant. We would also […]
Mukesh Tanwar Vs. State of Haryana (Punjab High court) As discussed above, investigation is still going on and out of total 31 accused, 10 are yet to be arrested and they are openly in league with the petitioner as well as other co-accused, who are in custody, while circulating the misleading information through social media […]
In the present case, the petitioner had made an application for refund under Section 54 of the Act and when the respondent had issued notice to them for rejection of the ineligible goods and services of SGST, CGST and IGST, they have given a detailed reply, objecting to the All these objections were required to be dealt with by the authority, before taking a final call, which is conspicuously absent.
Where State Government was extending cash subsidy to assessee for print and sale of text books at low rates to reach children of deprived sections of society, considering fact that assessee was carrying on the activity which squarely fell within the definition of section 10(15) (charitable purpose) and was dependent upon finance of the State, assessee was eligible for deduction under section 10(23C)(iiiab).
Paradeep Phosphates Ltd. Vs Asst. Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise (Orissa High Court) we are of the considered opinion that since an efficacious statutory remedy is available to the petitioner to assail the legality and validity of the order passed under Annexure-5, this Court should be slow in entertaining the writ petition at this stage. […]
The Uttrakhand High Court has on 29th August 2020 passed a landmark judgment in a case maintaining that Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act prescribes a provision for divorce and recognizes cruelty but doesn’t limit to just physical cruelty on the part of the spouse as a ground for divorce. Thus, cruelty shall include physical as well as mental cruelty as a ground of divorce. The Uttarakhand HC […]
