Income Tax : The issue concerns taxation of online cricket gaming winnings. The framework mandates a flat 30% tax with no deductions, emphasizi...
Goods and Services Tax : The issue concerns GST compliance requirements for businesses. It highlights that maintaining proper records and filing returns on...
CA, CS, CMA : The document outlines key statutory deadlines for April 2026 across multiple laws. It consolidates GST, income tax, and corporate ...
CA, CS, CMA : The calendar lists all major statutory deadlines across laws. It helps businesses track filings and avoid penalties through timely...
Goods and Services Tax : This update highlights all major compliance due dates for April 2026 under Income Tax and GST laws. It helps taxpayers stay on tra...
Goods and Services Tax : The Government introduced reforms such as e-invoicing and auto-population of data in GST returns. These measures improve accuracy,...
Goods and Services Tax : A recent advisory from Infosys GSTN, the technology backbone of India's Goods and Services Tax (GST) network, addressing a persist...
Goods and Services Tax : Recent communications from GSTN and CBIC have shed light on important aspects of HSN (Harmonized System of Nomenclature) code repo...
Goods and Services Tax : GSTN introduces Phase-III changes to GSTR-1 from April 2025 with dropdown HSN selection, tab-wise B2B/B2C reporting, and value val...
Goods and Services Tax : Online gaming tax collection lacks specific tracking. Govt issued notices for ₹1.43 lakh crore. GST at 28% applies to real money...
Goods and Services Tax : Gauhati High Court rules GSTR-1 vs GSTR-3B mismatch from clerical errors cannot trigger automatic tax recovery without Rule 88C pr...
Goods and Services Tax : The court quashed orders reversing ITC that were based solely on limitation under Section 16(4). It held that the amendment insert...
Goods and Services Tax : The Court quashed a GST demand where discrepancies arose from double entry in returns, granting a fresh hearing subject to a 25% p...
Goods and Services Tax : ITC cannot be mechanically denied to purchasers even if invoices are missing in GSTR-2B. Key takeaway: the ruling safeguards taxpa...
Goods and Services Tax : Madras High Court remitted a case for fresh adjudication after finding that fake invoices were generated in the petitioner’s GST...
Goods and Services Tax : The advisory clarifies that from November 2025, auto-populated values in Table 3.2 of GSTR-3B cannot be manually edited. Any corre...
Goods and Services Tax : GSTN resolved a technical issue for QRMP taxpayers on the GST Portal. Refund applications can now be filed, provided GSTR-3B for r...
Goods and Services Tax : GSTN updates GSTR-1/1A reporting. HSN code reporting in Table 12 is mandatory (4/6 digits based on turnover). Table 13 (document d...
Goods and Services Tax : From April 2025, GSTR-1 Table-12 will be split into B2B and B2C with mandatory HSN code selection from dropdown. Manual entry will...
Goods and Services Tax : Draft GSTR-2B for December 2024 (Oct-Dec 2024 quarter) will be generated on January 16, 2025, following extended return filing dea...
Draft GSTR-2B for December 2024 (Oct-Dec 2024 quarter) will be generated on January 16, 2025, following extended return filing deadlines per GST notifications.
The GST filing deadline for outward supplies in FORM GSTR-1 for December 2024 is extended to January 13, 2025, and for Q3 2024 to January 15, 2025.
From January 2025, reporting HSN codes in GSTR-1/1A Table 12 is mandatory. Key changes include auto-populated descriptions, dropdown selection, and bifurcated tabs.
Madras High Court held that due to non-compliance against notice issued in DRC-01A, the petitioner is directed to deposit 25% of the disputed tax and petitioner will be granted opportunity of being heard on payment of the amount.
Madras High Court held that due to non-compliance with notice issued under GST, the petitioner is required to deposit 25% of disputed tax and post deposit of amount, the petitioner will be granted an opportunity of being heard.
Madras High Court held that order confirming demand due to mismatch between returns under GST set aside with condition to deposit 25% of disputed tax amount since petitioner neither replied to DRC-01 and neither attended personal hearing.
Explore Section 61 of CGST Act, covering scrutiny of GST returns, officer’s authority, taxpayer obligations, and implications for compliance and discrepancies.
Held that the impugned order dated 29.08.2024 is set aside and the petitioner shall deposit 10% of the disputed tax within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
Madras High Court directed petitioner to deposit 10% of the disputed tax amount in case of ex-parte order passed. In case the amount is paid, the order of assessment shall be treated as show cause notice and the petitioner shall submit its objections.
Madras High Court held that ex-parte order passed under Section 73 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act without affording adequate opportunity of being heard is in violation of principles of natural justice. Accordingly, order set aside.
