Corporate Law : The report highlights major investigations by CBI, ED, DRI, SFIO, and NIA into NEET paper leaks, bank frauds, betting apps, and te...
Corporate Law : Explains why statements recorded during investigative summons carry evidentiary value and how careful handling can prevent escalat...
Corporate Law : Madras High Court rules ED needs a predicate offense to investigate, preventing arbitrary action and emphasizing adherence to juri...
Corporate Law : Explore the Enforcement Directorate's role under PMLA, 2002, its procedural aspects, and major Supreme Court rulings. Understand i...
Corporate Law : Explore 45 FAQs on EDs search, investigation, seizure, and arrest processes, including recent proceedings against high-profile fig...
Corporate Law : Authorities found Dubai property acquisitions by Indian residents routed through hawala, leading to action for violations of FEMA ...
Corporate Law : ED arrests two Chinese nationals for exploiting borrowers through digital loan apps, charging high rates, and extorting money usin...
Corporate Law : Bombay High Court directs Enforcement Directorate to regulate statement recording hours under PMLA, emphasizing same-day examinati...
Corporate Law : ED has frozen ₹6.04 crore linked to the fraudulent TradingFX app, which operated as a Ponzi scheme. Ongoing investigations are u...
Finance : Enforcement Directorate's crackdown on illegal forex trading in Ahmedabad leads to seizures worth ₹242.39 Cr. Two arrests made, ...
Fema / RBI : The Appellate Tribunal under SAFEMA held that attachment under PMLA cannot stand without evidence showing flow of tainted funds. T...
Corporate Law : The Court considered a request to permit limited operation of a frozen account for salary payments. It deferred interim relief and...
Income Tax : The tribunal ruled that buying property through a court-supervised auction does not shield a transaction from benami law. Where th...
Fema / RBI : The SAFEMA Appellate Tribunal held that property attachment under PMLA requires prima facie proof of a money trail. Mere suspicion...
Fema / RBI : The Tribunal held that holding and operating a foreign bank account without RBI approval is a continuing contravention under FEMA....
Corporate Law : Enforcement Directorate issues directive on summoning legal practitioners, emphasizing compliance with Section 132 of the Bharatiy...
Delhi High Court rejects Mahua Moitra’s writ petition against media reports on ED investigation, upholding principles of public interest and transparency.
Delhi High Court held that investigation for a period beyond 365 days not resulting in any proceedings relating to any offence under the Act, in terms of Section 8(3) of the PMLA Act, is that such seizure lapses. Thus, property so seized directed to be released.
Explore the Delhi High Court judgment quashing ED complaint in Nayati Healthcare case. Analysis of legal aspects and implications. Read more.
Explore the Delhi High Court’s landmark judgment on property seizure by ED, emphasizing the lapse if the PMLA investigation extends beyond 365 days without resulting in proceedings.
Delhi High Court judgment on quashing ED complaint (CC no.01/2011) under PMLA against Jeevan Kumar after his acquittal in the predicate offence. Legal analysis and implications.
Assessee-company was engaged in the business of providing unsecured short-term loans to its customers/borrowers in India via its Digital Application based platform called the ‘CashBean‟.
Explore the power of the Enforcement Directorate to compound offences under FEMA. Learn more about the compounding and contravention rules, as authorized by the Central Government. Compounding of Offences by Enforcement Directorate under FEMA.
Delhi High Court in matter involving Law Minister of the State of West Bengal in illegal coal excavation case directed Directorate of Enforcement (ED) to summons the petitioner at its Kolkata Office by giving at least 24 hours notice considering the age and medical status of the minister.
Delhi High Court held that as per the scheme of PMLA that power to issue summons u/s. 50 of PMLA is different from the power to arrest u/s. 19 of PMLA. Further, issuance of summons to join investigation and give some evidence or document to the investigation agency cannot be presumed to culminate into the arrest of person being so summoned.
Read Rajasthan High Court’s judgment in Bhagwati Jewellers regarding release of seized gold bullion and goods by Enforcement Directorate
