Corporate Law : The report highlights major investigations by CBI, ED, DRI, SFIO, and NIA into NEET paper leaks, bank frauds, betting apps, and te...
Corporate Law : Explains why statements recorded during investigative summons carry evidentiary value and how careful handling can prevent escalat...
Corporate Law : Madras High Court rules ED needs a predicate offense to investigate, preventing arbitrary action and emphasizing adherence to juri...
Corporate Law : Explore the Enforcement Directorate's role under PMLA, 2002, its procedural aspects, and major Supreme Court rulings. Understand i...
Corporate Law : Explore 45 FAQs on EDs search, investigation, seizure, and arrest processes, including recent proceedings against high-profile fig...
Corporate Law : Authorities found Dubai property acquisitions by Indian residents routed through hawala, leading to action for violations of FEMA ...
Corporate Law : ED arrests two Chinese nationals for exploiting borrowers through digital loan apps, charging high rates, and extorting money usin...
Corporate Law : Bombay High Court directs Enforcement Directorate to regulate statement recording hours under PMLA, emphasizing same-day examinati...
Corporate Law : ED has frozen ₹6.04 crore linked to the fraudulent TradingFX app, which operated as a Ponzi scheme. Ongoing investigations are u...
Finance : Enforcement Directorate's crackdown on illegal forex trading in Ahmedabad leads to seizures worth ₹242.39 Cr. Two arrests made, ...
Fema / RBI : The Appellate Tribunal under SAFEMA held that attachment under PMLA cannot stand without evidence showing flow of tainted funds. T...
Corporate Law : The Court considered a request to permit limited operation of a frozen account for salary payments. It deferred interim relief and...
Income Tax : The tribunal ruled that buying property through a court-supervised auction does not shield a transaction from benami law. Where th...
Fema / RBI : The SAFEMA Appellate Tribunal held that property attachment under PMLA requires prima facie proof of a money trail. Mere suspicion...
Fema / RBI : The Tribunal held that holding and operating a foreign bank account without RBI approval is a continuing contravention under FEMA....
Corporate Law : Enforcement Directorate issues directive on summoning legal practitioners, emphasizing compliance with Section 132 of the Bharatiy...
Explore 45 FAQs on EDs search, investigation, seizure, and arrest processes, including recent proceedings against high-profile figures and entities in India.
Detailed analysis of Pirtpal Singh vs Directorate of Enforcement case by Punjab and Haryana HC, regarding PMLA prosecution based on predicate offenses.
Explore 81 FAQs on EDs actions in India: search, seizures, arrests, and court proceedings. Detailed insights from ED press releases. Stay informed.
Explore 571 FAQs on the Enforcement Directorate’s (ED) functioning in India, covering its role, legislative framework, investigations, and preventive measures against money laundering and economic offenses.
The contention of assessee-company that the person issuing the show cause notice i.e., Special Director was “the” Adjudicating Authority and all proceedings pursuant to the show cause notice issued by him should be continued and concluded by the person issuing the show cause notice and no other was rejected.
Allahabad High Court asserts that if Enforcement Directorate (ED) doesnt provide an ECIR copy, it should inform summoned individuals about allegations. Details of the landmark judgment explained.
Dive into the legal intricacies of Sikandar Singh Vs Directorate of Enforcement case at Punjab and Haryana High Court. Explore key points on ECIR, PMLA, and more.
SC court emphasized that while the High Court has the authority to quash proceedings under Section 482 of Cr.PC, such powers should be exercised sparingly. It reiterated the duty of the police to investigate cognizable offenses and cautioned against interference in ongoing investigations.
Supreme Court ruling states that an order restraining coercive action doesn’t impede the Enforcement Directorate’s investigation under the 2002 Act.
Delhi High Court’s judgment on Talib Hassan Darvesh vs Directorate of Enforcement clarifies that ED summonses can’t be quashed merely for lack of document specification under PMLA.
