Company Law : The submission of MSME-1 is not only a requirement of the Companies Act, but it also has implications on the Income Tax Act and af...
Company Law : Learn the consequences of not filing MSME Form 1 on time as illustrated by a recent penalty case. Understand the legal requirement...
Company Law : Delve into the conundrum surrounding Section 42(7) of the Companies Act 2013 as the ROC Delhi's adjudication order highlights the ...
Company Law : Explore the game-changing Companies (Listing of Equity Shares in Permissible Jurisdictions) Rules, 2024, paving the way for Indian...
Company Law : Explore penalty order under Sec. 135 of Companies Act, 2013 on AECOM India for CSR non-compliance. Learn consequences, key takeawa...
Company Law : MCA imposes ₹50,000 penalty on Xinpoming Technology for non-filing of DIR-3 KYC under Rule 12A. Appeal can be filed within 60 da...
Company Law : Penalty imposed on Sh. Laxit Awla under Section 165 of Companies Act, 2013, for exceeding directorship limits. Details on violatio...
Corporate Law : Delhi High Court refuses interim relief against NFRA penalties imposed on CAs and CA firm in the Reliance Capital audit lapses cas...
Company Law : Failure to mention DIN in signed financial statements was held to violate Section 158. The authority imposed penalties while limit...
Company Law : Failure to disclose DIN in signed financial statements was held to violate Section 158. The ROC imposed penalties while limiting l...
Company Law : Failure to mention DIN in signed financial statements was treated as a violation of Section 158. The ROC imposed penalties while r...
Company Law : Authorities held that omission of Directors’ Identification Numbers in financial statements violates statutory requirements unde...
Company Law : Authorities held that filing financial statements without directors’ signatures violates mandatory provisions under Section 134....
Smith N Smith Chemicals receives Rs. 4 Lakh penalty from MCA for non-compliance with CSR policy in its board report. Read Detailed analysis
MCA recently imposed a penalty on a Company for violating CSR Section 135(5) of Companies Act, 2013 which mandates companies to spend at least 2% of their average net profits on CSR activities.
MCA levies penalties due to EGM notice non-compliance. Exploring the United Telecoms Limited case, Section 152 violation, and the implications. Analysis and outcome.
Tunwal E-Vehicle India Pvt. Ltd. & its directors ordered to pay penalty for not maintaining its registered office under Companies Act, 2013.
Government of India, Ministry of Corporate Affairs penalizes Mayflower Infra Realty for violating Section 161 of Companies Act, 2013. Detailed analysis of the case and imposed penalty.
The Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) recently made headlines with its decision to quash the adjudication against M/s. Varsha Ganga Metal and Minerals Private Limited. The case revolved around the non-availability of a quorum, which prevented the Annual General Meeting (AGM) from being conducted. Here’s a closer look into the matter. Background of the Case […]
Learn about the penalty imposed by MCA on Shri Ram Nidhi Limited for delaying MGT-14 filing under Companies Act, 2013, Section 117. Details and consequences discussed.
Discover the penal action taken by MCA against Ujjwalbhavishya Mutual Nidhi Limited for failing to comply with Section 137 of the Companies Act, 2013. Understand the legal consequences.
Insight into MCA’s decision to reduce penalties for Vena Energy’s delayed Form INC 20A filing, based on Companies Act 2013 provisions and circumstances.
Detailed analysis of MCA’s action against Shri Lal Mahal Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. for not mentioning CIN on their board report & AGM notice. Insights on penalties and consequences.
