Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Najmussaher Saeed Khan Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Najmussaher Saeed Khan Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) The AO made additions of ₹30 lakh each (later restricted to ₹15 lakh each by CIT(A)) under Section 69 alleging on-money payment in cash for purchase of a flat, based solely on an excel sheet found in a third-party search and a general statement of the builder. The ITAT held that: There was no direct evidence linking the assessees to any cash payment The builder’s statement was general and not specific to the assessees No independent enquiry or cash trail was established by the AO The Tribunal emphasized that additions cannot be made merely o...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Benami Veil Cannot Be Lifted by Clever Drafting: SC Restores Rejection of Plaint at Threshold Specific Performance Decree Does Not Die Automatically: SC Revives Execution Despite Delay in Deposit IBC Is Not a Recovery Shortcut: SC Rejects CIRP in Builder-Bank-Borrower Dispute No Signature, Yet Bound by Arbitration: SC Allows Collaborator to Invoke Arbitration Clause Entire Bank Deposits Cannot Be Taxed as Income – ITAT Restricts Addition to 2% in Renukamata Society Cases View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031