Company Law : The submission of MSME-1 is not only a requirement of the Companies Act, but it also has implications on the Income Tax Act and af...
Company Law : Learn the consequences of not filing MSME Form 1 on time as illustrated by a recent penalty case. Understand the legal requirement...
Company Law : Delve into the conundrum surrounding Section 42(7) of the Companies Act 2013 as the ROC Delhi's adjudication order highlights the ...
Company Law : Explore the game-changing Companies (Listing of Equity Shares in Permissible Jurisdictions) Rules, 2024, paving the way for Indian...
Company Law : Explore penalty order under Sec. 135 of Companies Act, 2013 on AECOM India for CSR non-compliance. Learn consequences, key takeawa...
Company Law : MCA imposes ₹50,000 penalty on Xinpoming Technology for non-filing of DIR-3 KYC under Rule 12A. Appeal can be filed within 60 da...
Company Law : Penalty imposed on Sh. Laxit Awla under Section 165 of Companies Act, 2013, for exceeding directorship limits. Details on violatio...
Corporate Law : Delhi High Court refuses interim relief against NFRA penalties imposed on CAs and CA firm in the Reliance Capital audit lapses cas...
Company Law : The authority imposed penalties after finding the company failed to hold its first board meeting within 30 days of incorporation. ...
Company Law : The issue centered on omission of DIN details by directors in financial filings. The ruling imposed penalties while exempting indi...
Company Law : The ROC imposed penalties for failure to disclose DIN in financial statements, violating Section 158. The key takeaway is that non...
Company Law : Failure to mention DIN in signed financial statements was held to violate Section 158. The authority imposed penalties while limit...
Company Law : Failure to disclose DIN in signed financial statements was held to violate Section 158. The ROC imposed penalties while limiting l...
Taskus India Private Limited faces penalties under Section 454 for violating Section 173 of the Companies Act, 2013, due to a 177 day gap between board meetings.
Registrar of Companies, Karnataka, imposes an 8 Lakh penalty on Ceratizit India Private Limited for not disclosing CSR non-spending reasons. Full details and implications
Ministry of Corporate Affairs penalizes Smalticeram India Private Limited for holding only two board meetings in a financial year instead of the required four. Learn about the case, penalties, and compliance details.
Breaking news: MA Kalyaneshwari Holdings penalized ₹21.96 Lakh by MCA for non-compliance with Companies Act, 2013. Detailed analysis, consequences, and appeal process revealed.
The Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) in India has imposed penalties on Loram Rail Maintenance India Private Limited for violating Section 173(1) and Section 118(10) of the Companies Act, 2013. This article provides an in-depth analysis of the case, the reasons for the penalty, and the consequences for the company and its directors. Facts about […]
The Ministry of Corporate Affairs imposes penalty on Triveni Nidhi Limited and its directors for non-mentioning of DIN in financial statements.
Government of India fines Nissan Motor India and directors 11.84 lakh for 178-day delay in appointing Company Secretary. Details, analysis, and implications.
Explore the Payswiff Technologies Private Limited case under the Companies Act, 2013. Learn about the penalty, violations, and analysis of this legal matter.
Ministry of Corporate Affairs has imposed penalties on Ceeta Industries for failing to include compliance with Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace Act in its board reports for 2019 and 2020. Learn more about penalties and company’s response.
Explore the details of the penalty order against MSRDC Sea Link Limited for violating Section 149(1) of the Companies Act, 2013. Learn about the case, company facts, and the adjudication process
