Company Law : The submission of MSME-1 is not only a requirement of the Companies Act, but it also has implications on the Income Tax Act and af...
Company Law : Learn the consequences of not filing MSME Form 1 on time as illustrated by a recent penalty case. Understand the legal requirement...
Company Law : Delve into the conundrum surrounding Section 42(7) of the Companies Act 2013 as the ROC Delhi's adjudication order highlights the ...
Company Law : Explore the game-changing Companies (Listing of Equity Shares in Permissible Jurisdictions) Rules, 2024, paving the way for Indian...
Company Law : Explore penalty order under Sec. 135 of Companies Act, 2013 on AECOM India for CSR non-compliance. Learn consequences, key takeawa...
Company Law : MCA imposes ₹50,000 penalty on Xinpoming Technology for non-filing of DIR-3 KYC under Rule 12A. Appeal can be filed within 60 da...
Company Law : Penalty imposed on Sh. Laxit Awla under Section 165 of Companies Act, 2013, for exceeding directorship limits. Details on violatio...
Corporate Law : Delhi High Court refuses interim relief against NFRA penalties imposed on CAs and CA firm in the Reliance Capital audit lapses cas...
Company Law : The authority held that securities cannot be allotted before dematerialising directors’ shareholding. A penalty was imposed desp...
Company Law : The authority penalized the company for issuing shares below the valuer-determined price, even though the shortfall was later reco...
Company Law : Delay in filing return of allotment under Section 42 resulted in penalties. However, reduced penalties were granted due to startup...
Company Law : The authority penalized premature utilization of funds raised through private placement in violation of Section 42(4). The ruling ...
Company Law : The case involved issuing a private placement offer before filing the required resolution. It was held that such non-compliance at...
Sarada Pleasure And Adventure Limited, a Bihar-based company, is ordered to pay penalties for violating Section 137 of the Companies Act, 2013 by not filing financial statements.
MCA imposes penalty on signatories of AT&T Communication Services India Private Limited for defect in filing e-form AOC-4 XBRL.
Explore the MCA’s decision to impose penalties on Namasthe Multimedia Limited and its MD for violating section 12(1) & (4) of the Companies Act, 2013.
According to Section 137(1) (Copy of financial statement to be filed with Registrar) of the Company Act, 2013, A copy of the financial statements, including consolidated financial statement duly adopted at the annual general meeting of the company, shall be filed with the Registrar within thirty days of the date of annual general meeting.
Every listed company and every other public company having a paid-up share capital of Five crore rupees or more shall have whole-time key managerial personnel. And Further this Limit Increased to Ten Crore or More & Applicable in respect of FY Commencing on or after 01-04-2020.
MCA order identifies that company failed to comply with Secretarial Standards, specifically regarding the mention of the number of board meetings held during the financial year in its reports. A show cause notice was issued to the company, and in response, they admitted the error. As a result, the penalty has been imposed on the company and its officers in default under Section 118(11) of the Companies Act, 2013.
Recent judgment reduces penalty for M/s. Vena Energy Renewables Resources Pvt Ltd’s delay in filing e-Form INC-20A, highlighting the MCA’s evolving compliance landscape.
MCA penalizes M/s Takraf India Pvt. Ltd. and its directors with Rs. 36.25 Lakh for not transferring Rs. 14.50 Lakh of unspent CSR as required by Section 135(6) of Companies Act, 2013.
Learn about the MCA’s penalty on Thiyagarajan Parthasarathy for acquiring two DINs, a violation of Section 155 of the Companies Act, 2013.
SMP Constructions, penalized by MCA for failing to attach Cash Flow Statement with AOC-4 form. Discover impact, legal provisions and key insights.
