Company Law : The submission of MSME-1 is not only a requirement of the Companies Act, but it also has implications on the Income Tax Act and af...
Company Law : Learn the consequences of not filing MSME Form 1 on time as illustrated by a recent penalty case. Understand the legal requirement...
Company Law : Delve into the conundrum surrounding Section 42(7) of the Companies Act 2013 as the ROC Delhi's adjudication order highlights the ...
Company Law : Explore the game-changing Companies (Listing of Equity Shares in Permissible Jurisdictions) Rules, 2024, paving the way for Indian...
Company Law : Explore penalty order under Sec. 135 of Companies Act, 2013 on AECOM India for CSR non-compliance. Learn consequences, key takeawa...
Company Law : MCA imposes ₹50,000 penalty on Xinpoming Technology for non-filing of DIR-3 KYC under Rule 12A. Appeal can be filed within 60 da...
Company Law : Penalty imposed on Sh. Laxit Awla under Section 165 of Companies Act, 2013, for exceeding directorship limits. Details on violatio...
Corporate Law : Delhi High Court refuses interim relief against NFRA penalties imposed on CAs and CA firm in the Reliance Capital audit lapses cas...
Company Law : The authority held that securities cannot be allotted before dematerialising directors’ shareholding. A penalty was imposed desp...
Company Law : The authority penalized the company for issuing shares below the valuer-determined price, even though the shortfall was later reco...
Company Law : Delay in filing return of allotment under Section 42 resulted in penalties. However, reduced penalties were granted due to startup...
Company Law : The authority penalized premature utilization of funds raised through private placement in violation of Section 42(4). The ruling ...
Company Law : The case involved issuing a private placement offer before filing the required resolution. It was held that such non-compliance at...
Thrissur Expressway Limited fined Rs. 30,33,200 for delays in appointing key managerial personnel as per Section 203 of the Companies Act, 2013.
Order against Violation of Section 189 read with Section 188 of the Companies Act, 2013 by M/s. Adani Power Limited- The order states that an inquiry was conducted by the Office of the Registrar of Companies, Ahmedabad, based on a directive from the Ministry of Corporate Affairs. During the inquiry, it was found that the company […]
The violation of Section 42 of the Companies Act, 2013 pertains to the non-compliance of regulations regarding private placement of shares by a company. In this specific case, M/s. Payswiff Technologies Private Limited failed to adhere to the provisions of Section 42(6) of the Act, which requires the company to keep the funds received for […]
Penalty for non-filing of Form MGT-14 is imposed under Section 117(2) of the Companies Act, 2013. The section states that if a company fails to file the resolution or agreement specified in sub-section (1) within the specified period, it will be liable to a penalty of ten thousand rupees.
Learn about the penalty imposed by the MCA on a CFO for violating company law by holding office in more than one company. Detailed analysis and implications provided.
Penalty imposed by MCA on B&M PROPMART PRIVATE LIMITED for violating Section 10A of Companies Act, 2013 i.e. for Failure to File Declaration of Commencement of Business
Government of India takes action against Ramudraurban Bachat Nidhi Limited for violating Section 92 of Companies Act, 2013. Detailed analysis and implications in this article.
Learn about the penalties imposed on RAMUDRAURBAN BACHAT MUTUAL BENEFIT NIDHI LIMITED for violating the Companies Act, 2013. Understand the violations, fines, and the appeal process
Learn about penalty imposed by MCA for failing to mention Director Identification Numbers (DIN) against directors’ names in financial statements. Detailed analysis and implications of case.
Menzies Aviation Bobba (Bangalore) Private Limited failed to appoint a whole-time company secretary (CS) within the prescribed time frame, resulting in a violation of Section 203 of the Companies Act, 2013 for a period of 730 days. The managing director, Mr. Bobba Veerasamynathan, has been held liable for the violation. The order imposes a penalty […]
