Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Siddegowda Channa Basavaiah Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Siddegowda Channa Basavaiah Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) The Bangalore ITAT deleted the addition of ₹4.81 lakh made under Section 69, holding that the assessee had reasonably explained the source of cash deposits based on surrounding circumstances and human probabilities. The AO had treated excess cash deposits as unexplained due to: Lack of one-to-one correlation between withdrawals and deposits, Time gap between withdrawals and redeposit, Absence of documentary proof for cash received from relatives. However, the Tribunal held: Strict one-to-one nexus is not required; once overall cash avail...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence Section 54F Exemption Allowed on Sale of Redeveloped Flat: ITAT Mumbai View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031