Goods and Services Tax : The Gujarat High Court ruled that Input Tax Credit cannot be claimed unless the supplier has actually paid tax to the Government u...
Goods and Services Tax : GSTN has implemented automated interest computation through the Tax Liability Break-up mechanism in GSTR-3B to identify delayed ta...
Goods and Services Tax : The Delhi High Court ruled that GST authorities can issue a single SCN covering multiple financial years under Sections 73 and 74 ...
Goods and Services Tax : The High Court observed that filing GST returns is the statutory mechanism for disclosing tax liability. Failure to file returns w...
Goods and Services Tax : The operators avoided traditional hacking and instead used structural loopholes in website optimisation. The incident shows how te...
Goods and Services Tax : A PIB backgrounder explains how nine years of GST have expanded the taxpayer base, increased collections, and simplified India's i...
Goods and Services Tax : A GST Bar Association has sought a three-month extension for filing GSTAT appeals, citing procedural complexities and evolving fil...
Goods and Services Tax : Authorities uncovered fraudulent ITC claims exceeding ₹8 crore without actual supply of goods. The ruling highlights that ITC is...
Goods and Services Tax : A tax audit official was arrested while accepting ₹5 lakh as part of an alleged bribe to reduce a proposed tax demand. The case ...
Goods and Services Tax : The Delhi South CGST Commissionerate has arrested a key person linked to three firms for allegedly evading ₹16.30 crore in GST t...
Goods and Services Tax : The Supreme Court held that an accused cannot be denied copies of documents forming part of the chargesheet merely because prosecu...
Goods and Services Tax : The court quashed orders reversing ITC that were based solely on limitation under Section 16(4). It held that the amendment insert...
Goods and Services Tax : The Court set aside a GST demand after finding that tax liability was discharged under CGST and SGST instead of IGST. Authorities ...
Goods and Services Tax : The question whether the contractual work was an exempt construction activity or taxable manpower supply required fact-finding, wh...
Goods and Services Tax : Kerala High Court held that reliefs sought in writ cannot be entertained as debit of penalty from amount receivable could only be ...
Goods and Services Tax : The Central Government has authorized the GSTAT Principal Bench, New Delhi, to hear appeals under Section 101B of the CGST Act. Th...
Goods and Services Tax : CBIC has amended Notification No. 9/2025-Central Tax (Rate) to revise tariff entries in GST schedules in line with Finance Act, 20...
Goods and Services Tax : GST Portal revises interest computation in GSTR-3B, factoring minimum cash ledger balance and auto-populating non-editable interes...
Goods and Services Tax : Raigad CGST Commissionerate issued SOPs for taxpayer grievance redressal, introducing open house meetings, local seminars, and esc...
Goods and Services Tax : GST notification updates the definition of Nominated Agency in Notification No. 26/2018-CT (Rate). The new definition refers to L...
Authorities uncovered fraudulent ITC claims exceeding ₹8 crore without actual supply of goods. The ruling highlights that ITC is inadmissible where the supply chain is non-existent or broken.
Judicial precedents confirm that where goods or services support taxable supplies, only proportionate ITC reversal is permitted. Complete denial of credit would violate the value-added taxation principle.
The court quashed orders reversing ITC that were based solely on limitation under Section 16(4). It held that the amendment inserting Section 16(5) allowed ITC claims for FY 2017-18 to 2020-21 up to 30.11.2021.
Under Section 74A, the limitation for issuing GST demand notices becomes 42 months for all cases. This is longer than the earlier three-year limit for non-fraud cases, increasing compliance exposure for bona fide taxpayers despite procedural simplification.
Since restaurant services are notified under Section 9(5), GST is paid by the e-commerce operator and not the supplier. Therefore, composition dealers are not restricted from supplying through such platforms.
The Bombay High Court ruled that GST portal limitations cannot override Section 18(3) of the CGST Act. It allowed transfer of CGST and IGST credits across States following amalgamation, holding that no statutory restriction exists.
GST Portal revises interest computation in GSTR-3B, factoring minimum cash ledger balance and auto-populating non-editable interest. Taxpayers must self-assess and pay any additional liability.
The Finance Bill, 2026 clarifies GST treatment of post-sale discounts by bringing them within Section 34 time limits. The ruling ends ambiguity while enforcing strict deadlines and ITC reversal compliance.
The court examined whether assigning long-term industrial lease rights attracts GST. It held that such transfers are dealings in immovable property, not taxable supplies.
The court held that once late fee is imposed for delayed annual return filing, a further general penalty is not permissible. Section 125 applies only where no specific penalty exists.
