Corporate Law : Explore the Competition Commission of India’s merger remedies, including structural, behavioral, and hybrid solutions, to addres...
Corporate Law : CCI penalizes Maruti Suzuki ₹200 crore for restricting dealer discounts under anti-competitive policies. Case highlights include...
Corporate Law : CCI finds no evidence of PVR's alleged abuse of dominance in film exhibition. Claims lacked support, validating PVR's business str...
Corporate Law : CCI fined Maruti Suzuki for restricting dealer discounts, impacting competition and consumer welfare in the Indian automotive mar...
Goods and Services Tax : CCI mandates passing on GST rate cuts to consumers, directing Cinema Ventures to deposit Rs. 54.44 lakh in the Consumer Welfare Fu...
Corporate Law : CCI seeks stakeholder comments on proposed amendments to the 2011 Penalty Recovery Regulations, aiming to streamline penalty recov...
Corporate Law : Explore proposed amendments to the Competition Commission of India (General) Regulations, 2009, analyzing their impact and implica...
Corporate Law : Explore the proposed amendments to Regulations 35, 37, and 50 of the Competition Commission of India (General) Regulations 2009. L...
Corporate Law : Explore the Ministry of Corporate Affairs draft policy for pre-legislative consultation and a comprehensive review of rules and re...
Corporate Law : The Competition Commission of India (CCI) seeks feedback on the draft regulations for determining turnover or income. Share your c...
Corporate Law : Competition Commission of India examines Google’s app, payment, and ad policies following allegations of anti-competitive practi...
Corporate Law : CCI closes the case on allegations against Greenbay Infrastructure for unfair practices and non-delivery of plots under the Compet...
Corporate Law : CCI penalizes Meta ₹213.14 crore for abusing dominance through WhatsApp's 2021 Privacy Policy update. Cease-and-desist orders an...
Corporate Law : Kalpit Sultania Vs IREL (India) Ltd (Competition Commission of India) The case Kalpit Sultania vs IREL (India) Ltd was brought bef...
Goods and Services Tax : Competition Commission of India has dropped anti-profiteering proceedings against Ireo Waterfront Pvt. Ltd, confirming no addition...
Corporate Law : CCI penalizes Meta ₹213.14 crore for abusing dominance through WhatsApp's 2021 Privacy Policy update. Cease-and-desist orders an...
Corporate Law : Explore the amendments to the Competition Commission of India (CCI) regulations in 2024, enhancing transparency and procedures. Un...
Corporate Law : Discover the Competition Commission of Indias in-depth study on AI's impact on competition, efficiency, and innovation. Get insigh...
Corporate Law : Competition Commission of India announces new regulations and penalty guidelines to streamline competition law enforcement. Read m...
Corporate Law : Delve into the Competition Commission of India's (CCI) regulations on determining turnover or income, exploring amendments, stakeh...
By the statutory provision, the legislature has authorized the Central Government to classify and revise rates/freight with respect to carriage of passenger and goods. The impugned rate instructions/circulars issued by OP were uniformly applicable for all the entities who wanted to avail the services of Indian railways for transporting their goods.
Section 12B was introduced in the MRTP Act by Act 30 of the 1984 as an independent remedy for a claimant in addition to a suit that he may file to claim any loss or damage that he may suffer by reason of any monopolistic or restrictive or unfair trade practice as would be clear from sub-section (4) of section 12B. There is no reference at all in section 12B of the MRTP Act to the provisions of either section 10
The Competition Commission of India has held that there is no contravention of the provisions of the Act by the alleged agreement between Yash Raj Films Private Limited and its various associated enterprises. The Competition Commission of India passed its order in the case filed by Ajay Devgn Films against Yash Raj Films Private Limited.
GAL is not enjoying the position of dominance in the relevant market on any of the parameters and factors given in section 19(4). GAL is not found to be in a dominant position in terms of the market share, market structure, size and resources, dependence of consumers etc. Thus, when the GAL is not in a dominant position in the relevant market the question of abuse of its dominance does not arise. Therefore, in the instant matter, no case of violation of provisions of section 4 is made out.
a. In the appointment of stockists by way of issue of ‘NOC’ and regulating the number of stockists in contravention of Section 3(3)(b) of the Competition Act, 2002. b. In preventing and restricting the retailers from allowing discounts to the consumers in contravention of Section 3(3)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002. As mentioned earlier a suo motto investigation be initiated into the nexus between associations both horizontal and vertical for as observed most of the practices have evolved over several decades. In fact, association in the pharma industry associations have impacted on several activities along the value chain.
The Competition Commission of India has found Fast Way Group abusing its dominance in the cable TV service in the territory of Punjab and Chandigarh in violation of the provisions of the Competition Act, 2002. The order was passed pursuant to investigation carried out by the Director General upon information filed by M/s Kansan News Private Limited a broadcaster of a news and current affairs TV channel known as ‘Day and Night News’ and operating in the states of Punjab, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh and Union Territory of Chandigarh.
What is competition in the market? • In common parlance, competition in the market means sellers striving independently for buyers’ patronage to maximize profit (or other business objectives). • A buyer prefers to buy a product at a price that maximizes his benefits whereas the seller prefers to sell the product at a price that maximizes his profit.
The Competition Commission of India has found cement manufacturers in violation of the provisions of the Competition Act, 2002 which deals with anticompetitive agreements including Cartels. The order was passed pursuant to investigation carried out by the Director General upon information filed by Builders Association of India. The Commission has imposed penalty on 11 Cement Manufacturers named in the information @0.5 times of their profit for the year 2009-10 and 2010-11. The penalty amount so worked out amounts to more than Six thousand Crores. The Commission has also imposed penalty on the Cement Manufacturers Association.
The Competition Commission of India (CCI) has found Chemist & Druggist Association, Goa (CDAG) in violation of the provisions of the Competition Act, 2002 which deals with anticompetitive agreements. The Commission has imposed penalty of Rs. 2 Lakhs @10% on the average of the receipts for financial year 2008-09, & 2009-10 on CDAG.
Corporate Affairs Minister Dr. M.Veerappa Moily had said the Competition Commission of India compliments Sectoral Regulators and there is no question of encroachment on the jurisdiction of Sectoral Regulators. Dr. Moily stated this today while interacting with the Press on the occasion of releasing a compendium titled “Innovative March to New Horizon of Corporate Growth” to highlight the achievements of the Ministry of Corporate Affairs. The Minister observed that Competition Commission of India is a Market Regulator whose mandate is to foster competition and protect the markets from anti competitive practices.
