Goods and Services Tax : Even after the sunset clause, anti-profiteering obligations continue through tribunals and policy directions, leaving businesses e...
Goods and Services Tax : The Delhi High Court upheld an anti-profiteering order, ruling that merely increasing product quantity or volume after a GST rate ...
Goods and Services Tax : GSTAT ruled 18% interest on GST anti-profiteering amounts applies prospectively from April 1, 2020, upholding that it cannot be im...
Goods and Services Tax : Delhi HC rules increasing product quantity or base price instead of reducing MRP after a GST rate cut violates Section 171 of the ...
Goods and Services Tax : GST 2.0 rate cuts trigger Anti-Profiteering rules (Sec 171). Summary covers obligation to pass on tax/ITC benefit, MRP display nor...
Goods and Services Tax : Leading consumer and public policy research and advocacy group, CUTS International has requested the Finance Minister, Ms Nirmala ...
Goods and Services Tax : Empanelment of Advocates / Law Firms for representing the National Anti-profiteering Authority and Director General of Anti-Profit...
Goods and Services Tax : Anti-Profiteering Measures The National Anti-Profiteering Authority (NAA) was constituted on 28th November, 2017 under Section 17...
Goods and Services Tax : The Tribunal held that maintaining ticket prices by increasing base price after GST reduction violated Section 171. It directed de...
Goods and Services Tax : The case addressed increased ITC benefits post-GST without corresponding price reduction. The tribunal ruled this violated Section...
Goods and Services Tax : The dispute concerned failure to reduce prices after GST. The Tribunal held that documentary evidence showed benefit was already t...
Goods and Services Tax : GSTAT held that no anti-profiteering violation arises where construction, agreement, and payments occur entirely in the GST regime...
Goods and Services Tax : The issue involved a calculation error in the final order. The Tribunal clarified the correct per sq. ft. benefit including GST an...
Goods and Services Tax : GST Authority will stop accepting requests for examination of input tax credits and tax rate reductions from April 1, 2025, as per...
Goods and Services Tax : Ministry of Finance empowers GST Appellate Tribunal to examine input tax credits and tax rate reductions, effective from October 1...
Goods and Services Tax : Central Goods and Services Tax (Fourth Amendment) Rules, 2022 – CBIC omitted following GST Rules 122,124,125,134 and 137 vi...
Goods and Services Tax : CBIC notifies Competition Commission of India to examine whether input tax credits availed by any registered person or the reducti...
Applicant alleged profiteering by Ramprastha Promoter & Developer Pvt. Ltd in its project ‘Rise’, Ramprastha City, Sector-37D, Gurugram.
Director-General of Anti-Profiteering Vs Dange Enterprises (NAA) Authority also find that after the closure of the hearing, Respondent vide his email dated 13.06.2022 has stated that he has agreed to submit the requisite data in the prescribed format as required by the DGAP for the entire period of investigation. In the given situation, as narrated […]
Sh. Deepak Naik Vs Prestige Estates Projects Ltd. (NAA) Authority funds that the Respondent has gained the benefit of ITC on the supply of Construction Services after the implementation of GST w.e.f 01.07.2017 and the Respondent was required to pass on such benefit of ITC to the homebuyers/customers by way of commensurate reduction in prices […]
Anti-Profiteering Provisions of Section 171 of CGST Act, 2017 violated by Respondent, yet provisions of IBC, 2016 will nonetheless prevail.
Varun Goel Vs Town Park Buildcon Private Ltd. (NAA) a. The Respondent vide his submissions dated 05.04.2022 has contended that the DGAP has not incorporated the ITC of VAT in the pre-GST period for the computation of profiteering which ought to have been done. He has further submitted before this Authority that the said ITC […]
NAA held that ITC benefit of Rs. 16,49,897/- was required to be passed on to 39 flat buyers by SSBC Real Estate Pvt. Ltd.
Nilang Shastri Vs Swati Realty (NAA) Applicant alleged profiteering by Respondent Swati Realty in respect of purchase of a Flat in the Respondent’s project –Swati Florence, Ahmedabad, Gujarat. The Applicant has alleged that the Respondent had not passed on the benefit of ITC to him by way of commensurate reduction in price after the implementation […]
Since the registration was obtained for the subject projects post the introduction of Goods and Services Tax only, the provisions of Section 171 dealing with Anti-profiteering could not be made applicable to the said projects in the view of the fact that there was no additional ITC that had been made available to the Respondent,
NAA held that Jay Cee Chemists did not pass on the benefit of exemption of GST on Sanitary Napkin’s amounting to Rs. 2048 to Customers.
Rajeev Goyal Vs Prateek Infra Projects India Pvt. Ltd. (NAA) The Authority finds that the Applicant No. 1 has alleged fraud and forgery on the part of the Respondent and fault in calculations of the profiteered amount, saleable area and the total turnover of the Respondent by the DGAP for the Project Prateek Edifice. The […]
