Goods and Services Tax : Even after the sunset clause, anti-profiteering obligations continue through tribunals and policy directions, leaving businesses e...
Goods and Services Tax : The Delhi High Court upheld an anti-profiteering order, ruling that merely increasing product quantity or volume after a GST rate ...
Goods and Services Tax : GSTAT ruled 18% interest on GST anti-profiteering amounts applies prospectively from April 1, 2020, upholding that it cannot be im...
Goods and Services Tax : Delhi HC rules increasing product quantity or base price instead of reducing MRP after a GST rate cut violates Section 171 of the ...
Goods and Services Tax : GST 2.0 rate cuts trigger Anti-Profiteering rules (Sec 171). Summary covers obligation to pass on tax/ITC benefit, MRP display nor...
Goods and Services Tax : Leading consumer and public policy research and advocacy group, CUTS International has requested the Finance Minister, Ms Nirmala ...
Goods and Services Tax : Empanelment of Advocates / Law Firms for representing the National Anti-profiteering Authority and Director General of Anti-Profit...
Goods and Services Tax : Anti-Profiteering Measures The National Anti-Profiteering Authority (NAA) was constituted on 28th November, 2017 under Section 17...
Goods and Services Tax : GSTAT directed the DGAP to re-examine the profiteering computation after questions were raised about ignored cost increases, negat...
Goods and Services Tax : GSTAT concluded that elimination of entertainment tax and other levies reduced the effective tax incidence, requiring suppliers to...
Goods and Services Tax : The Tribunal found merit in the respondent’s argument that ITC comparison should be based on identical goods and services and di...
Goods and Services Tax : GSTAT held that although profiteering of ₹1.70 crore was computed, the developer had passed on ₹2.02 crore to home-buyers. Wit...
Goods and Services Tax : The Tribunal accepted the DGAP report finding no extra ITC benefit after GST implementation and held that Section 171 was not viol...
Goods and Services Tax : GST Authority will stop accepting requests for examination of input tax credits and tax rate reductions from April 1, 2025, as per...
Goods and Services Tax : Ministry of Finance empowers GST Appellate Tribunal to examine input tax credits and tax rate reductions, effective from October 1...
Goods and Services Tax : Central Goods and Services Tax (Fourth Amendment) Rules, 2022 – CBIC omitted following GST Rules 122,124,125,134 and 137 vi...
Goods and Services Tax : CBIC notifies Competition Commission of India to examine whether input tax credits availed by any registered person or the reducti...
Competition Commission of India (CCI) order on the complaint filed by Syed Ali Hussaini against Vasavi and GP Infra LLP. CCI directs DGAP to investigate ITC benefit claim.
Competition Commission of India (CCI) directs DGAP to verify claim of Ireo Grace Realtech of passing ITC benefit following application alleging profiteering over the purchase of flat No. CD-A5-09-902 in The Corridors project in Sector 67A, Gurgaon, Haryana
In the case of DGAP Vs. Smookey Kitchen Foods OPC Pvt. Ltd., a Subway franchisee. CCI concludes the franchisee denied tax reduction benefits to customers.
Competition Commission of India’s ruling on GST implications for Preferential Location Charges (PLC) in the Sudhir Kumar Jain Vs DLF Limited case.
Read the detailed analysis of the Competition Commission of India’s ruling against MICL Realty LLP for GST profiteering. Full text of the CCI order provided.
Detailed analysis of the Competition Commission of India’s order against Srinivasa Cine Enterprises for not passing on GST rate reduction benefits.
Explore the Competition Commission of India’s ruling on an anti-profiteering case involving Principal Commissioner vs. Krishna Enterprises. The case centers on penalties under CGST Rules, 2017.
Get insights on Daanish Electricals vs Eros Elevators case. Analysis of allegations, Commission findings, and conclusion on anti-profiteering provisions.
In Pruthviraj Dhavale vs Ashdan Developers case, Competition Commission of India (CCI) concludes that benefit of ITC was passed on, dropping Section 171 proceedings.
Read the full text of the Competition Commission of India’s order in the case of alleged profiteering by Uttar Pradesh Avas Evam Vikas Praband Karyalaya.
