Case Law Details
Case Name : DCIT Vs Amardeep Constructions (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2019-20
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Mumbai
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
DCIT Vs Amardeep Constructions (ITAT Mumbai)
Builder Followed Law, AO Followed Statement – Tribunal Chooses Law- No Completion, No Revenue: ITAT Blocks ₹18 Cr ‘Phantom Profit’ Addition. 43CA Safe Harbour Now 10% – ITAT Applies Retrospectively. The Tribunal held that income cannot be taxed merely on a survey statement when the builder consistently follows the Project Completion Method. Additions of ₹19.2 crore were deleted. Assessing Officer cannot switch to percentage completion arbitrarily. The Tribunal rejected the addition based solely on Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.


