Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Amardeep Constructions (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2019-20
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

DCIT Vs Amardeep Constructions (ITAT Mumbai)

Builder Followed Law, AO Followed Statement – Tribunal Chooses Law- No Completion, No Revenue: ITAT Blocks ₹18 Cr ‘Phantom Profit’ Addition.  43CA Safe Harbour Now 10% – ITAT Applies Retrospectively. The Tribunal held that income cannot be taxed merely on a survey statement when the builder consistently follows the Project Completion Method. Additions of ₹19.2 crore were deleted. Assessing Officer cannot switch to percentage completion arbitrarily. The Tribunal rejected the addition based solely on

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
February 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
232425262728