Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Bevinakuppe Ningegowda Vs ITO (Karnataka High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Bevinakuppe Ningegowda Vs ITO (Karnataka High Court) Give Me 7 Days or Give It Up! – HC tells Taxman: 5-Day Notice = 0% Validity; Giving Less Than 7 Days to Reply u/s 148A(b) is Fatal – Entire Reassessment & Penalty Quashed -Karnataka High Court In this case, Assessee approached the Karnataka High Court challenging the validity of the reassessment proceedings initiated for AY 2018-19. The challenge was not on the merits of the addition but on a fundamental procedural illegality: the notice issued u/s 148A(b) did not grant the mandatory minimum period of seven days to respond. The noti...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

No Specific Charge, No Penalty: Mumbai ITAT Cancels Section 270A Levy for Defective Notice Mere Investigation Wing Alert Is Not ‘Reason to Believe’: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Reopening Liquor Trader Gets Relief as ITAT Reduces GP Rate to 3.13% & Deletes Separate Expense Disallowance From Clean Chit to Crores in Penalty: SEBI Reopens Suzlon Case and Strikes Hard ITAT Restores Section 69 Matter to AO After Ex Parte Assessment and Appeal Orders View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930