Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Arvindbhai Jewellers Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Arvindbhai Jewellers Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) AO Smelled Something Fishy, ITAT Found Only Jewellery- 9.37 Crore Deposits-Tribunal Says ‘Business, Not Black Money Assessee, a gold jewellery trader, deposited ₹9.37 crore in cash during the demonetisation period (9 Nov – 30 Dec 2016). AO found that ₹9.78 crore of cash sales (85% of total yearly cash sales) were shown only in October 2016, compared to ₹48 lakh in October 2015, with most invoices below ₹2 lakh to avoid PAN requirement. Books were audited, but AO felt sales were “fabricated” to launder cash. Books were rejec...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Interest on Delayed Sales Tax, Service Tax & PF Payments Deductible; TDS Interest Disallowed: Patna ITAT Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031