Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Shujath Ulla Shariff Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Shujath Ulla Shariff Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) Bogus Purchase Addition Deleted – ITAT Bangalore Holds Third-Party Data Insufficient Without Independent Verification AO made an addition of ₹21,17,844 u/s 69A, alleging bogus purchases from M/s Prestige Interiors based solely on information received from the Department of Commercial Taxes that certain invoices were fictitious & unsupported by movement of goods. Assessee, who had declared income u/s 44AD from trading activity, produced invoices, GST registration & supplier details but was unable to furnish transport bills or confirmation...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

SC Slams Casual Sanction of ₹8 Cr Loan After Borrower Defaults From Day One Inheritance Isn’t a Birthright When a Valid Will Exists: SC Interest on Bank Deposits Can Still Qualify for 80P Deduction- Bangalore ITAT Gives Relief to Credit Co-operative Society SC: Interest on Borrowed Funds Allowed Even for Investment Through Group Concerns – Commercial Expediency Prevails Penalty for Unsecured Loans Not Automatic Merely for Section 68 Addition: ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031