Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ramaswamy Balasubramanya Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ramaswamy Balasubramanya Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) Return Filed Under Correct PAN Cannot Be Ignored Due to Duplicate PAN Issue-Bengaluru ITAT Deletes Section 69 Addition The Bengaluru ITAT allowed the appeal of an individual taxpayer and deleted additions made under section 69, holding that the Revenue cannot ignore a return of income merely because it was filed under the taxpayer’s correct PAN while proceedings were initiated under an old PAN that the assessee had already sought to deactivate. The assessee had purchased an immovable property worth ₹70 lakh, carried out equity share tran...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Entire Books Cannot Be Rejected for One Unproved Expense: ITAT Ahmedabad Section 10(10B) Exemption Allowed on BSNL VRS Compensation: ITAT Ahmedabad On-Money Addition Restricted to Co-owner’s Investment Share: ITAT Ahmedabad Section 54B: Time to Revisit Rural Agricultural Land Withdrawal Rules Section 80P(2)(d) Deduction Allowed on Interest from Co-operative Bank Deposits: ITAT Pune View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031