This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
No section 271C Penalty if TDS duly deducted & remitted at year end
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- ITO (TDS) Vs Om Sai Ram Enterprises Ravulapalem (ITAT Visakhapatnam)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2014-15
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Visakhapatnam
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
ITO (TDS) Vs Om Sai Ram Enterprises Ravulapalem (ITAT Visakhapatnam)
The issue under consideration is whether the penalty levied u/s 271C is justified in law?
In the present case, assessee awarded contract work and at the same time, it also supplied material to the contractor. Revenue found that the assessee passed the entries for supply of materials/payments from time to time without making TDS as required under section 194C. Accordingly, Revenue initiated penalty proceedings under section 271C for assessee’s failure to deduct tax at source and remittance to Government account.
ITAT states ...




