This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Section 163 Inapplicable Without Direct or Indirect Income Flow to NRI: ITAT Hyderabad
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Sai Pragathi Estates & Constructions Private Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2009-2010
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Hyderabad
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Sai Pragathi Estates & Constructions Private Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
ITAT Hyderabad Holds Developer Not an “Agent” of NRI u/s 163; Capital Gains on Developer’s Share Cannot Be Taxed in Its Hands
The Hyderabad Bench of the ITAT allowed the assessee’s appeal for AY 2009-10 and deleted the addition made by treating the developer company as an “agent” of an NRI u/s 163(1)(c). The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer was not justified in invoking the representative assessee provisions in respect of sale of Unit Nos. 602 and 602A, which were exclusively f...





