Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : M/s. Ghanshyamdas Gems and Jewels Vs DCIT (ITAT Hyderabad)
Appeal Number : IT(SS)A No. 16/Hyd/2011
Date of Judgement/Order : 07/11/2014
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
CA Prarthana Jalan
Hon’ble Hyderabad Bench has in the case of M/s. Ghanshyamdas Gems and Jewels v/s DCIT in  IT(SS)A No. 16/Hyd/2011  has held that Section 292BB  of the Income Tax Act, 1961 would operate prospectively as it curtails the right of the assessee.
Assessee submitted that the CIT(A) erred in holding that the provisions of section 292BB of the Act apply to the facts of the case and hence the assessment is in order, without considering the fact that the assessment is null and void for not issuing notice u/s. 143(2) in time. It was submitted that the provisions of section 292BB are prospective and the CIT(A) having accepted factual position that the notice u/s. 143(2) was issued beyond 12 months from the end of the month in which the return was filed, the CIT(A)should have noted that the assessment made was invalid.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031