Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Raheja Developers Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Raheja Developers Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) Sale of Shops to Shell Company Held Bogus, Own Funds Routed back through Accommodation Entry- ITAT confirms Addition of ₹19.06 Cr & ₹17.53 Cr Assessee claimed sale of 22 shops in Raheja Mall, Gurugram to M/s Sagar Trade Links Pvt. Ltd. (STPL) for ₹36.56 crore, receiving ₹19.06 crore in AY 2011-12 & ₹17.53 crore in AY 2012-13. AO treated the transaction as bogus & added the amounts u/s 68, along with commission @ 2%, alleging accommodation entries. CIT(A) upheld the additions. Assessee appealed before ITAT. 1. Reopening of...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Interest on Delayed Sales Tax, Service Tax & PF Payments Deductible; TDS Interest Disallowed: Patna ITAT Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031