Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Pattaveettil Parameswar Ramachandran Vs ITO (Kerala High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Pattaveettil Parameswar Ramachandran Vs ITO (Kerala High Court)

Conclusion: Reopening of notice under section 148A(b) was valid as assessee was served notices both physically and via email and assessee had been granted sufficient opportunity to respond to the notice however, assessee failed to avail the opportunity granted. Thus, there was no violation of the principles of natural justice and notice was valid.

Held: Assessee had sold an immovable property during the year financial year 2015-16 but he failed to file a return for the assessmen

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2025
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031