Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Pritibala Harshad Ajmera (ITAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-2016
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
DCIT Vs Pritibala Harshad Ajmera (ITAT Kolkata) Relinquishment of Tenancy Right is Capital Gain- 54 & 54F Can Be Claimed Simultaneously Assessee filed return declaring income of ₹1.44 crore. Case was selected for scrutiny. AO, noting non-compliance, completed assessment u/s 144 & added ₹3.15 crore as LTCG, denying exemption u/s 54/54F. CIT(A), after calling remand report, allowed exemption holding assessee eligible, as new residential property was purchased from entire sale/tenancy proceeds. Revenue contended that assessee held more than one residential house (Flats 4A & 5A...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

No Bogus LTCG Addition Without Proof of Price Manipulation Linking Assessee: ITAT Raipur Bad Debt Write-off Enough After TRF Ltd.; Verify Only Section 36(2): ITAT Bangalore Ad Hoc Disallowance Without Defects Unsustainable; GST/TDS Late Fee Remanded: ITAT Lucknow Section 115BAB Benefit Can’t Be Denied Over Internal Appeal Allocation: ITAT Raipur CIT(A) Must Decide Jurisdiction Before Remanding Reassessment to AO: ITAT Raipur View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031