Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Gopal Anil Kumar Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Gopal Anil Kumar Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) Reassessment Quashed – Mechanical Approval U/s 151 Based on Wrong Fact that Assessee Was a Non-Filer The assessee, a civil contractor executing works for government agencies such as BBMP and KRIDL, filed his return for AY 2018-19 declaring income of ₹83.45 lakh. After a search u/s 132 in December 2021, the AO reopened the assessment u/s 147 and completed reassessment determining total income at ₹3.32 crore by making additions aggregating to ₹2.48 crore including disallowance u/s 37 and additions u/s 68. The assessee challenged the reassessm...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

ITAT Rajkot: Hybrid Seed Company’s Income Held as Agricultural ITAT Rajkot: Mechanical Approval Invalid – Reopening U/s 148 Quashed ITAT Ahmedabad: No Penalty for Mere Wrong Claim – U/s 271(1)(c) Deleted ITAT Mumbai: Section 68 Addition Deleted – Mere Suspicion & Third-Party Info Not Enough ITAT Delhi: No Proper Service of U/s 148 Notice – Entire Reassessment Quashed View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930