Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Madhavi Beeravolu Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Madhavi Beeravolu Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)

Penalty u/s 271AAC & 270A Restored – ITAT Sends Back Penalty Appeals as Quantum Itself Remanded

 Assessee did not file return for AY 2018-19. AO reopened the case u/s 147 based on sale of immovable property & cash deposits. Assessment was completed ex-parte u/s 147 r.w.s 144/144B, determining income at ₹1,00,91,053/-. Penalties were separately levied: (i) ₹93,941/- u/s 271AAC(1) on addition u/s 69A for cash deposits, & (ii) ₹2,15,052/- u/s 270A for under-reported income. CIT(A) d

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

No Further Section 14A Disallowance After Reasoned Suo-Motu Adjustment ITAT Hyderabad quashes final TP assessment as time-barred despite DRP directions Delay in Filing Appeals Condoned Despite Massive Additions and Penalty Capital Gains Addition Set Aside for Denial of Fair Opportunity Estimated Gross Profit Addition Collapses When Excess Stock Is Not Proved View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
December 2025
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031