Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Polavarapu Basaveswara Rao Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Polavarapu Basaveswara Rao Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad) Reopening Invalid for Want of Proper Approval – ITAT Quashes U/s 148 Notice The Hyderabad ITAT quashed the reassessment proceedings holding that approval from the correct authority under Section 151 is a jurisdictional requirement, and non-compliance renders the notice void. The notice under Section 148 was issued after 3 years from the end of the assessment year, but the Assessing Officer obtained approval only from the Principal Commissioner, whereas the law mandates sanction from higher authority (PCIT/CCIT/DGIT level) under Section 151(i...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening Fails When AO Taxes a Different Income Than the One Recorded in Reasons ITAT Quashes Reassessment: Only Profit Element Matters, Not Entire Commodity Transaction Value ITAT Upholds Denial of Section 80GGC Deduction for Donations to Alleged Accommodation Entry Political Party SBI Wins LTC TDS Dispute: No Assessee-in-Default When Bank Followed High Court Orders ITAT: Profit Cannot Be Estimated Arbitrarily Merely Because Books Were Not Produced View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930