Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Shiroki Automobiles India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Shiroki Automobiles India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Delhi) CESTAT Slams Customs for Ignoring Binding Precedent; Holds Car Seat “Track Assembly” Classifiable Under Heading 9401, Quashes ₹16 Cr Demand The appellant is an importer. It imported “track assembly” as part of car seats to be sold to seat manufacturers. It claimed classification under chapter heading 9401 9000 as part of seat. The customs department sought to classify under chapter 8708 9900 as part/accessory of motor vehicle. A demand of over Rs.16 crores was confirmed. Hence; appeal. Hon’ble CESTAT, Del...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031