Case Law Details
Case Name : Shiroki Automobiles India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All CESTAT CESTAT Delhi
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Shiroki Automobiles India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Delhi)
CESTAT Slams Customs for Ignoring Binding Precedent; Holds Car Seat “Track Assembly” Classifiable Under Heading 9401, Quashes ₹16 Cr Demand
The appellant is an importer. It imported “track assembly” as part of car seats to be sold to seat manufacturers. It claimed classification under chapter heading 9401 9000 as part of seat. The customs department sought to classify under chapter 8708 9900 as part/accessory of motor vehicle. A demand of over Rs.16 crores was confirmed. Hence; appeal.
Hon’ble CESTAT, Del...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

