Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Aeropure UV Systems Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Aeropure UV Systems Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Pune) The Pune ITAT deleted penalty under Section 271(1)(c), holding that a bonafide difference in share valuation methodology cannot be treated as furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. The assessee had issued shares at a premium based on a valuation report using multiple methods (NAV, DCF, and Fair Value). The Assessing Officer rejected this approach, adopted NAV method, and made an addition under Section 56(2)(vii)(b), which was partly sustained by CIT(A). Subsequently, penalty of ₹4.83 lakh was levied alleging inaccurate particulars...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930