Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Adilakshmi Vangala Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-2017
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Adilakshmi Vangala Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad) The Hyderabad ITAT quashed reassessment proceedings holding that incorrect or non-existent facts cannot be used to extend limitation under Section 149. The Assessing Officer reopened the case alleging cash deposits exceeding ₹50 lakh based on multiple transactions. However, upon verification , the Tribunal found that actual deposits were only ₹38.10 lakh, with other transactions being unrelated or wrongly considered. Since the escaped income was below ₹50 lakh, the applicable limitation under Section 149(1)(b) was 3 years, whereas the notice und...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930