This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Reopening Quashed – Incorrect Facts Cannot Extend Limitation Beyond 3 Years
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Adilakshmi Vangala Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2016-2017
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Hyderabad
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Adilakshmi Vangala Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
The Hyderabad ITAT quashed reassessment proceedings holding that incorrect or non-existent facts cannot be used to extend limitation under Section 149.
The Assessing Officer reopened the case alleging cash deposits exceeding ₹50 lakh based on multiple transactions. However, upon verification , the Tribunal found that actual deposits were only ₹38.10 lakh, with other transactions being unrelated or wrongly considered.
Since the escaped income was below ₹50 lakh, the applicable limitation under Section 149(1)(b) was 3 years, whereas the notice und...




