Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Brijeshkumar Natvarlal Patel Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Brijeshkumar Natvarlal Patel Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)

Assessee, an NRI settled in the USA since 2001, had purchased an immovable property for ₹66.95 lakh. Since no return was filed, & information showed the property purchase, the AO reopened the case u/s 148. During reassessment, Assessee did not respond to notices, except for one letter stating he was unaware of proceedings & needed time to collect documents from India. AO completed the assessment ex parte, treating the entire investment as unexplained u/s 69A.

Assessee appealed late by 312 days, explaining that he

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penalty Cannot Survive on Estimated Bogus Purchase Addition: ITAT Deletes 271(1)(c) Escapement Below ₹50L: ITAT Quashes 148 Notice Issued After 3 Years Ex-Parte 144 Assessment Discovered After Bank Freezing – Fresh Opportunity Granted Reopening Beyond 3 Years: ITAT Quashes 148 Notice Approved by Wrong Authority Commission to Relatives Not Automatically Bogus: ITAT Bangalore Grants Relief  View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
December 2025
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031