Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Vimalkumar Prakashchandra Jain Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Vimalkumar Prakashchandra Jain Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) Rule 46A Evidence Ignored — ITAT Sends ₹2.47 Cr Capital Addition Back for Fresh Verification Assessee introduced ₹2.47 crore as capital in the partnership firm M/s Vrundavan Corporation. In reassessment u/s 147 r.w.s. 144, the AO treated this capital introduction as unexplained money u/s 69A, mainly because the assessment was completed ex-parte. Before the CIT(A), Assessee produced detailed evidence, including: – His personal books, – Bank statements & cheque details showing funds introduced through banking channels, – Conf...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening Fails on Both Counts: Invalid Sec 148A Notice and Time-Barred Sec 148 Render Assessment Void Coffee Income: Rule 7B Overrides Rule 7 – ITAT Remands for Segregation of Own vs Purchased Produce Duty Drawback Taxable Only on Receipt – ITAT Deletes Addition & U/s 270A Penalty Skill Development = “Education” – ITAT Allows Sec 11 Exemption to Charitable Trust No Penalty for Wrong Claim or Head of Income – ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930