Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Gangaiah Nagaraju Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Gangaiah Nagaraju Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) Conclusion: Addition against unexplained cash deposit of ₹49.50 lakh was remanded back to AO for verification if the deposits were from business activities, the addition under Section 69A could not stand. Held: Assessee, was found to have made a cash deposit of Rs.49,45,800 and received contract income of Rs.3,03,315, with tax deducted at source. A notice under section 148 was issued on 29.3.2019 due to the assessee’s failure to file a return. After issuing a notice undersection 133(6) to Indian Overseas and Corporation Banks, assessee explained t...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930