Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO Vs Vinipul Inorganics Private Limited (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ITO Vs Vinipul Inorganics Private Limited (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT Mumbai: No Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) on Estimated Bogus Purchase Additions The Mumbai ITAT upheld deletion of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) where additions on account of bogus purchases were made purely on an estimated basis. In this case, although the AO initially added the entire amount of alleged bogus purchases, the Tribunal in quantum proceedings restricted the addition to 12.5%, treating it as an estimate of profit element. The Tribunal observed that when income is determined based on estimation rather than concrete evidence of c...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 68 Additions Fail: Documentary Evidence Cannot Be Ignored Without Enquiry Commission Disallowance Remanded – 133(6) Non-Response Not Sufficient; Ad-hoc Expenses Cut to 10% Stamp Duty vs Actual Value Dispute: ITAT Orders DVO Valuation ITAT Bangalore Remands ₹49L Sec 68 Addition & ₹3.74L TDS Disallowance for Fresh Verification Penalty U/s 272A(1)(d) Deleted: Reasonable Cause Subsequent Compliance Accepted View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930