Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ikramudin Mohammed Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-2016
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ikramudin Mohammed Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad) Summary: The ITAT Hyderabad quashed reassessment proceedings on the ground that the notice issued under Section 148 was barred by limitation and based on incorrect facts. The Assessing Officer issued the notice on 07.04.2022 for AY 2015–16, which was beyond the permissible time limits under Section 149. The Tribunal observed that the actual alleged escaped income was below ₹50 lakh, making the applicable limitation period three years, which had already expired. It further noted that the AO had artificially inflated the escapement amount by duplic...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

Ajay Kumar Agrawal FCA, a science graduate and fellow chartered accountant in practice for over 26 years. Ajay has been in continuous practice mainly in corporate consultancy, litigation in the field of Direct and Indirect laws, Regulatory Law, and commercial law beside the Auditing of corporate and View Full Profile

My Published Posts

ITAT Grants TDS Credit Despite Employer’s Failure to Deposit Tax with Government ITAT Deletes Section 270A Penalty as Estimated Addition Cannot Justify Penalty ITAT Deletes Bogus Purchase Addition as AO Failed to Disprove Documentary Evidence TDS Under Section 194J Upheld for Coaching Institute Faculty Bad Debt Deduction Allowed as Effective Write-Off Need Not Close Debtor Account View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930