Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : PCIT Vs M.Kiran Kumar (Madras High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
PCIT Vs M.Kiran Kumar (Madras High Court) Summary: The Madras High Court upheld the ITAT’s order deleting multiple additions made solely on the basis of a statement recorded during search without corroborative evidence. The Court held that an admission under Section 132(4), especially when made to “buy peace,” cannot independently justify additions unless supported by material evidence. It found that the alleged undisclosed income was not attributable to the assessee in his individual capacity and lacked supporting proof. The Court also affirmed that business transactions routed through...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

Ajay Kumar Agrawal FCA, a science graduate and fellow chartered accountant in practice for over 26 years. Ajay has been in continuous practice mainly in corporate consultancy, litigation in the field of Direct and Indirect laws, Regulatory Law, and commercial law beside the Auditing of corporate and View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reassessment Quashed as AO Used Section 147 Instead of Mandatory Section 153C ITAT Deletes Section 68 Addition as Customer Advances Were Regular Business Receipts Section 263 Proceedings Quashed as AO’s Order Was Not Erroneous in Jewellery Case ITAT Quashes Section 270A Penalty as AO Failed to Specify Exact Clause Section 56(2)(x) Not Applicable Before 01.04.2017: ITAT Delhi View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031