Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Vadivel Chandran Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2021-22
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Vadivel Chandran Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)

ITAT Bangalore condones delay – NFAC’s notices invalid as sent to email not mentioned in Form 35; Tax Appeal Restored: Incorrect Email Use Vitiates NFAC’s Ex Parte Proceedings; Natural Justice Violated: Ex Parte Addition Quashed Due to Service on Incorrect Email

Assessee, an employee of Cognizant Technology Solutions, purchased a flat in Chennai for ₹71.71 lakh, claiming that funds came from a ₹95 lakh housing loan from ICICI Bank & cash of ₹32.50 lakh received from his parents. AO disbelieved the

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
February 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
232425262728