Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sunder Jindal Vs NFAC (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sunder Jindal Vs NFAC (ITAT Delhi) Loan Withdrawals Cited as Source – Assessee Gets Fresh Chance to Prove Source of Deposits- ITAT Sends Cash Deposit Dispute Back for Verification Delhi SMC Bench  set aside the ex-parte assessment u/s 144, giving the Assessee another chance to explain cash deposits of ₹13.74 lakh made in his bank account. The case was reopened u/s 147 on information that the Assessee had deposited ₹13.74 lakh in cash during FY 2011-12. Despite repeated notices, there was no compliance, & AO completed best judgment assessment, treating the deposits as unexplained u/s...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

No Specific Charge, No Penalty: Mumbai ITAT Cancels Section 270A Levy for Defective Notice Mere Investigation Wing Alert Is Not ‘Reason to Believe’: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Reopening Liquor Trader Gets Relief as ITAT Reduces GP Rate to 3.13% & Deletes Separate Expense Disallowance From Clean Chit to Crores in Penalty: SEBI Reopens Suzlon Case and Strikes Hard ITAT Restores Section 69 Matter to AO After Ex Parte Assessment and Appeal Orders View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930