Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO vs Samrat Madhav Paikrao (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ITO Vs Samrat Madhav Paikrao (ITAT Mumbai) Reassessment Notice Quashed – ITAT Mumbai Follows Vodafone Idea Ruling on Invalid Sanction Revenue filed appeal against the NFAC order dated 29.05.2025 deleting addition made in reassessment u/s 147, while the Assessee filed cross-objection challenging the very validity of notice u/s 148 for AY 2018-19. Assessee argued that the notice dated 05.04.2022 was issued beyond three years from the end of AY 2018-19 &  the approval was wrongly obtained from the PCIT, instead of the Principal Chief Commissioner (PCCIT) as mandated by Section 151(1) (prio...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence Section 54F Exemption Allowed on Sale of Redeveloped Flat: ITAT Mumbai View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031