Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO vs Samrat Madhav Paikrao (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

ITO Vs Samrat Madhav Paikrao (ITAT Mumbai)

Reassessment Notice Quashed – ITAT Mumbai Follows Vodafone Idea Ruling on Invalid Sanction

Revenue filed appeal against the NFAC order dated 29.05.2025 deleting addition made in reassessment u/s 147, while the Assessee filed cross-objection challenging the very validity of notice u/s 148 for AY 2018-19.

Assessee argued that the notice dated 05.04.2022 was issued beyond three years from the end of AY 2018-19 &  the approval was wrongly obtained from the PCIT, instead of the Prin

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penalty Cannot Survive on Estimated Bogus Purchase Addition: ITAT Deletes 271(1)(c) Escapement Below ₹50L: ITAT Quashes 148 Notice Issued After 3 Years Ex-Parte 144 Assessment Discovered After Bank Freezing – Fresh Opportunity Granted Reopening Beyond 3 Years: ITAT Quashes 148 Notice Approved by Wrong Authority Commission to Relatives Not Automatically Bogus: ITAT Bangalore Grants Relief  View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
December 2025
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031