Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO vs Samrat Madhav Paikrao (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ITO Vs Samrat Madhav Paikrao (ITAT Mumbai) Reassessment Notice Quashed – ITAT Mumbai Follows Vodafone Idea Ruling on Invalid Sanction Revenue filed appeal against the NFAC order dated 29.05.2025 deleting addition made in reassessment u/s 147, while the Assessee filed cross-objection challenging the very validity of notice u/s 148 for AY 2018-19. Assessee argued that the notice dated 05.04.2022 was issued beyond three years from the end of AY 2018-19 &  the approval was wrongly obtained from the PCIT, instead of the Principal Chief Commissioner (PCCIT) as mandated by Section 151(1) (prio...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening Fails When AO Taxes a Different Income Than the One Recorded in Reasons ITAT Quashes Reassessment: Only Profit Element Matters, Not Entire Commodity Transaction Value ITAT Upholds Denial of Section 80GGC Deduction for Donations to Alleged Accommodation Entry Political Party SBI Wins LTC TDS Dispute: No Assessee-in-Default When Bank Followed High Court Orders ITAT: Profit Cannot Be Estimated Arbitrarily Merely Because Books Were Not Produced View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930