This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
ITAT clarifies distinction between joint & absolute ownership for Section 54F
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- ITO Vs Rasiklal N. Satra (ITAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
ITO Vs Rasiklal N. Satra (ITAT Mumbai)
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai Bench, in the case of Income Tax Officer (ITO) versus Rasiklal N. Satra, dismissed an appeal filed by the Revenue, upholding the assessee’s claim for exemption under Section 54F of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The core of the dispute revolved around the interpretation of “ownership of a residential house” in the context of co-owned property for the purpose of claiming capital gains exemption.
Background of the Case
The assessee, Rasiklal N. Satra, reported a capital gain of R...




