Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Oceaneering International GmbH Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2023-24
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Oceaneering International GmbH Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) Assessee, a non-resident engaged in shipping operations, was assessed u/s 44BB on presumptive basis. AO included GST component collected separately in invoices as part of “gross receipts” while computing deemed income @7.5% u/s 44BB, relying on amended section 145A & ICDS. DRP upheld inclusion of GST. ITAT held that section 44BB is a special code with a non-obstante clause overriding sections 28 to 43A, and deemed income has to be computed only on amounts specified in section 44BB(2), namely amounts paid or payable on account of carr...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Delay Condoned with Cost: ITAT Grants Fresh Chance, Slams Non-Compliance Section 153C Valid but Addition Fails: No Incriminating Material = No Deemed Dividend 870-Day Delay Not Condoned: ITAT Refuses Relief, Calls Out Negligence & “No Sufficient Cause” Wrong Section Claim Not Fatal: ITAT Remands Matter & Nullifies Penalty Penalty U/s 270A Quashed: No Specific Charge of “Misreporting” = No Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031