TaxGuru Newsletter Subscription
Information You Can Rely On.
CA, CS, CMA - Once a taxpayer opts for this Scheme and files the returns of income for a year and in the subsequent year if he declares lower income than the prescribed percentage then he shall not be eligible to claim the benefit of this section for the next five years and in addition if his total income […]...
Read MoreCA, CS, CMA - The presumptive taxation scheme is framed under Three sections- Section 44AD and Section 44ADA & Section 44AE of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Person adopting presumptive taxation schemes are exempt from getting their books of account audited....
Read MoreCA, CS, CMA - To reduce the burden of various compliances, Govt. has introduced a scheme of Presumptive Taxation under section 44AD, 44ADA and 44AE of the Income Tax Act 1961....
Read MoreCA, CS, CMA - Section 44AE, inter alia provides that, the profits and gains shall be deemed to be an amount equal to seven thousand five hundred rupees per month or part of a month for each goods carriage or the amount claimed to be actually earned by the assessee, whichever is higher....
Read MoreCA, CS, CMA - There are various sections in the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act) e.g., 44AD, 44AE, 44ADA etc., (popularly known as Presumptive Income sections) according to which, the profits and gains from eligible / prescribed businesses / professions carried by the prescribed categories of assessee (known as eligible assessee) are required to be computed...
Read MoreCA, CS, CMA - ICAI decided to exclude audit conducted under section 44ADA of Income-tax Act, 1961 for reckoning the specified number of tax audit assignments...
Read MoreP.D. Usha Rani Vs. The Income Tax Officer (ITAT Hyderabad) - Penalty u/s. 271B is attracted for failure to get accounts audited u/s. 44AB. Even though the law prescribes the levy of penalty, in case of default, the same is not automatic as provisions of Section 273B gives relief, when there is a reasonable cause....
Read MoreShri Amitkumar Hasmukhbhai Shah Vs DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) - The contention of the assessee is that he has shown income from truck under section 44AE of Rs. 2,01,000/- which includes income of Rs.1,07,890/- from M/s. Chandan Carriers, and therefore, no separate addition of Rs.1,07,890/- is warranted. None of the lower authorities has verified this contention ...
Read More
P.D. Usha Rani Vs. The Income Tax Officer (ITAT Hyderabad) -
Shri Amitkumar Hasmukhbhai Shah Vs DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) -
