TaxGuru Newsletter Subscription
Information You Can Rely On.
Income Tax - Presumptive Taxation Scheme for Plying, Hiring, or Leasing Goods Carriages – Section 44AE For simplifying the complications involved in calculating the taxable income for small business owners, the Presumptive Taxation Scheme was construed under the Income Tax Act. Section 44AE offers this Presumptive Taxation scheme which allows for a ...
Read MoreIncome Tax - Section 44AE(3)] The assessee will be deemed to have been allowed the deductions under sections 30 to 38. Accordingly, the written down value of any asset used for the purpose of the business of the assessee will be deemed to have been calculated as if the assessee had claimed and had actually been allowed the deduction in ....
Read MoreIncome Tax - CRITICAL COMPARISON AND ANALYSIS OF PRESUMPTIVE TAX PROVISIONS UNDER INCOME TAX ACT 1961 – 44AD, 44ADA & 44AE I. APPLICABILITY 1. Section 44AD clearly specifies the ‘Eligible Assessee’ as ‘all resident Individuals, HUFs, or Firms (excluding Limited Liability Partnership Firms)’ engaged in ‘Eligible Business’, which i...
Read MoreIncome Tax - Section 44AE: Special Provisions for Computing Profits & Gains of Business of Plying, Hiring or Leasing Goods Carriage Applicable to whom ? An assessee, who owns not more than 10 goods carriages at any time during the P.Y. and who is engaged in the business of plying, hiring or leasing such goods carriages. (The provisions […]...
Read MoreIncome Tax - The Presumptive Taxation Scheme, according to sections 44AA of the Income-tax Act, 1961, was introduced to relieve the small business owners and income professionals from maintaining a book of accounts. They will now be enabled to declare their total taxable income at a predefined rate....
Read MoreIncome Tax - ICAI decided to exclude audit conducted under section 44ADA of Income-tax Act, 1961 for reckoning the specified number of tax audit assignments...
Read MoreBijoy Shribastab & Anr. Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata) - Bijoy Shribastab & Anr. Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata) It is not in dispute that the assessee had not maintained books of accounts for his transport business. It is not in dispute that the assessee owns less than 10 vehicles and is accordingly entitled to offer income u/s 44AE of the Act. It is not the [...
Read MoreP.D. Usha Rani Vs. The Income Tax Officer (ITAT Hyderabad) - Penalty u/s. 271B is attracted for failure to get accounts audited u/s. 44AB. Even though the law prescribes the levy of penalty, in case of default, the same is not automatic as provisions of Section 273B gives relief, when there is a reasonable cause....
Read MoreShri Amitkumar Hasmukhbhai Shah Vs DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) - The contention of the assessee is that he has shown income from truck under section 44AE of Rs. 2,01,000/- which includes income of Rs.1,07,890/- from M/s. Chandan Carriers, and therefore, no separate addition of Rs.1,07,890/- is warranted. None of the lower authorities has verified this contention ...
Read MoreF.No. 225/233/2019/ITA-II - (14/08/2019) - Which of the following has to be considered while calculating the presumptive income under section 44AE of the Income-tax Act.1961 (Act) in the context of amendment made in sub-section (2) of section 44AE of the Act vide Finance Act, 2018 w.e.f. 01.04.2019....
Read More
