Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kilari Jagannatham Suwresh Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Kilari Jagannatham Suwresh Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) The ITAT Bangalore dismissed multiple appeals holding that inordinate delay of ~870 days cannot be condoned in absence of “sufficient cause”, despite elaborate explanations by the assessee. The assessee attributed the delay to an employee who allegedly withheld statutory notices and failed to inform the Directors, leading to ex-parte orders. However, the Tribunal found that no credible evidence linked the employee to handling tax matters, nor was the delay period (March 2023 to March 2025) properly explained. The Tribunal emphasized that ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Wrong Section Used to Deny Depreciation Set-Off; Section 263 Order Quashed Municipal Body’s Section 10(20) Exemption Cannot Be Denied Due to Wrong Claim in Return No Addition on a Different Issue if Reopened Issue Fails: ITAT Deletes ₹5.75 Crore Disallowance Retracted Statement Alone Cannot Justify Section 68 Addition: ITAT Deletes Accommodation Loan Additions Section 263 Cannot Be Invoked as AO Made No Addition After Enquiry: ITAT Mumbai View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930