Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Macrotech Developers Limited (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : I.T.A. No.2382 /Mum/2022
Date of Judgement/Order : 21/12/2023
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

DCIT Vs Macrotech Developers Limited (ITAT Mumbai)

ITAT Mumbai held that foreign exchange loss incurred by the assessee attributable to purchase of material is revenue expenditure and it cannot be included in the cost of project. Accordingly, the same is allowable as deduction.

Facts- Assessee is engaged in the business of real estate, construction and development. Assessee filed the return of income declaring total income of Rs.62,08,53,170/- and book profit u/s. 115JB of Rs.45,42,04,660/-. Subsequently, the return was revised on 29/03/2018 declaring Nil income after setting off all brought forward losses of Rs.21,37,37,597/-. The case was selected for scrutiny under CASS and the notices were duly served on the assessee. The revised return is filed due to the merger of M/s Suryakripa Constructions Ltd w.e.f. 01.04.2015 vide order dated 24.04.2017 of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT).

AO during the course of assessment noticed that there are specified domestic transactions and also international transactions in the nature of guarantee. Accordingly, the Assessing Officer made a reference to the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) for determination of arm’s length price. The TPO passed an order u/s. 92CA(3) dated 28/06/2019 determining the total transfer pricing adjustment of Rs.4,32,22,246/- towards corporate guarantee given by the assessee towards security cum Guarentee given on senior notes and Tenancy Agreement. AO passed the assessment order incorporating the Transfer Pricing adjustment. AO also made adjustment of the disallowance under section 14A to the book profits computed under section 115JB. The assessee preferred appeal before the CIT(A) against the final order of assessment. The CIT(A) deleted the TP adjustment and other disallowances made by AO. The revenue is in appeal before the Tribunal against the order of the CIT(A).

Conclusion- Held by the co-ordinate bench in assessee’s own case in ITA No.2266 & 2239/Mum/2022 dated 17.04.2023 where the co-ordinate bench upheld guarantee commission @0.3523%. Respectfully following the above decisions of the co-ordinate bench, we do not see any infirmity in the findings given by the CIT(A). Accordingly, this ground of the revenue is accordingly is dismissed.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031