Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Manish Mansukhlal Maradiya Vs CIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-2012
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Manish Mansukhlal Maradiya Vs CIT (ITAT Mumbai) Mumbai ITAT partly allowed the assessee’s appeal, holding that commission income from accommodation entries must be restricted to actual transactions and reasonable rate. The Tribunal observed: AO estimated commission @ 5% on ₹4.60 crore, assuming involvement in 8 entities However, from the statement recorded u/s 131 (page 4–5): Assessee admitted involvement only in 3 entities Accepted accommodation entries of ₹1.20 crore only No material was brought to link assessee with remaining 5 entities The ITAT held: Addition cannot be made o...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 153C Proceedings Invalid Where Deemed Search Date Is After 1-4-2021: ITAT Bangalore Selling & Marketing Expenses Cannot Be Disallowed Due to Ledger Nomenclature Error: ITAT Bangalore Executive Search Fees Not Taxable as FTS or Royalty Under India–Netherlands DTAA: ITAT Mumbai No TDS on Reimbursement of Common Legal Expenses: ITAT Mumbai BSNL VRS Employees Eligible for Full Exemption of Retrenchment Compensation & Leave Encashment: ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031